... Metzger s ... On this basis, it would be a simple haplography error on the part of the archetype of B, not a doctrinal excision. But doesn t that strainMessage 1 of 6 , Aug 3, 2006View Source--- In email@example.com, "James Snapp, Jr."
> George Young,
> The features in Codex Bezae that you described do not reflect the
> struggles of an anonymous editor. They are "sortes sanctorum"
> notations -- the ancient equivalent of the Magic Eightball. For a
> description of their purpose, consult the fourth edition of
> "The Text of the New Testament," pp. 266-267 (in the Appendix).On this basis, it would be a simple haplography error on the part of
> In other news: I did a little bit of facsimile-checking on Mark
> 4:11. In D, DEDOTAI ends a line and GNWNAI begins the following
> line. In B, DEDOTAI ends a line, too.
> Yours in Christ,
> James Snapp, Jr.
the archetype of B, not a doctrinal excision. But doesn't that
strain credibility, or is it a case of an opportunistic omission,
retained because of its convenience?
... I find this interesting, and I have never seen it discussed before. If someone has the time for it, I would like to learn how the sortes sanctorum notesMessage 1 of 6 , Aug 3, 2006View SourceGeorge Young wrote:
> My understanding of "sortes sanctorum," however,I find this interesting, and I have never seen it discussed before. If
> does not really jive with that expounded by Metzger,
> and the marginal notes in Bezae seem to be of a
> different dimension altogether (at least from the
> "traditional" practice of the same).
someone has the time for it, I would like to learn how the "sortes
sanctorum" notes were used, with maybe an example or two.
Michael Marlowe, Although one could get the impression from Metzger s comments in pp. 266-267 of TOTNT (3th ed. -- I typed 4th earlier; oops) that MetzgerMessage 1 of 6 , Aug 3, 2006View SourceMichael Marlowe,
Although one could get the impression from Metzger's comments in pp.
266-267 of TOTNT (3th ed. -- I typed "4th" earlier; oops) that
Metzger discovered that the "hermeneiai" are divination-notes, by
1901 Rendel Harris had written a book titled "The Annotators of Codex
Bezae (With Some Notes on Sortes Sanctorum)," so it would seem that
BMM wasn't the first to discern what they were. Also, Scrivener
listed the notations somewhere, I think.
I'm not sure how the Sortes Sanctorum were used -- possibly a person
would simply open the codex to a page at random and read the
notation. Metzger suggests that "A number would be selected, perhaps
by throwing dice, and then the pages of the Gospel codex would be
turned until the sentence that corresponded to the number was
It's not clear to me why only 69 notations appear in D, only on the
pages containing Mark 1:1-10:22. Maybe they were copied from the
margins of an exemplar which only contained Mark. Perhaps Harris'
book (which is available on CD from SolaScripturaPublishing) could
provide some more information.
In other news: in Mark 4:11 ...
Peshitta supports GNWNAI.
1241 reads DEDWTAI TA MUSTHRIA. (No GNWNAI.)
1342 reads LEGEI instead of ELEGEN, and -- this is interesting -- TO
MUSTHRION DEDOTAI GNWNAI. (Word-order agreeing with the Alexandrian
word-order, but with GNWNAI.)
Can somebody consult T&T (or other resources) for info about the
versional evidence at Mark 4:11?
Yours in Christ,
James Snapp, Jr.
Curtisville Christian Church