In a message dated 2/24/2004 10:15:22 PM Pacific Standard Time, ... No, Karel, I meant exactly what I said in the original post. I am genuinely interested to
Message 1 of 4
, Feb 25, 2004
In a message dated 2/24/2004 10:15:22 PM Pacific Standard Time, k.hanhart@... writes:
We have exchanged our differences concerning the Griesbach hypothesis
before. I have called on the listers backed by Mark Goodacre to debate the
arguments put forward by and Steiner in favor of Markan priority. Alas,
the pro-Griesbachians have not offered strong counterarguments deflating
I have not based my conclusions on the Matthean version of the feeding
of the 4000. You apparently believe that particular version would prove
No, Karel, I meant exactly what I said in the original post. I am genuinely interested to know what you think, and why, of the feeding of the 4000 in Matthew. I don't have a strong opinion on the matter myself, and I don't see the solution as demonstrative of any particular source hypothesis, at least not in any a priori sense. If you choose to evade the question, that is fine, but don't assume I have an ulterior motive in asking the question beyond what I actually asked for. Thanks.
Blessed John XXIII National Seminary
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer.
We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.