In a message dated 11/1/2001 6:37:27 AM Eastern Standard Time,
<< I have a long review article in the current issue of Tyndale Bulletin 52.2
(2001), pp. 275-294, under the title: 'The Role of Eyewitnesses in the
Formation of the gospel Tradition'.>>
I look forward to reading this. The role of eyewitnesses in the formation of
the gospel tradition is a question with which I rarely concern myself, but
which is of obvious and enormous important in terms of the historical basis
of our faith. I would argue, however, assuming the GH, that the role of
eyewitnesses in the formation of the gospel tradition is virtually nil in any
developments subsequent to the Gospel of Matthew which came first on this
hypothesis. Would others agree, mutatis mutandis (i.e., assuming most would
substitute Mark for Matt in the previous sentence)?
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...