Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
> > So a unique text, that doesn't show any real attachment to any known text
> > family of a harmony
> Incorrect, Larry. It shows an affinity with Justin's harmony.
Um, pardon my ignorance, but do we actually **have** Justin's Harmony? And if
we don't, how can the claim be made that the Harmony you speak of has an
affinity with it?
> > shows up about 1400 and purportedly has more original
> > material than manuscripts that are very early?
> That's what Petersen and Boismard argue.
I'd like to check this. May we have a citation from their works where they
argue this, please?
Jeffrey B. Gibson
7423 N. Sheridan Road #2A
Chicago, Illinois 60626