> Maybe Theophilus/intended audience knew the rest of the story about
> Paul's outcome? Why would the author need to repeat the part of the
> from 62 on that Theophilus/intended-audience would have already known?
Or maybe Luke didn't want to tell the rest of the story if he/they
didn't know it, or remind them of it if they did, pursuant to a silence
beginning at Acts 12.17.