*******There s a story from somewhere that Steiner used alcohol in his thirties to erase the psychic ability he was born with, because he couldn t control itMessage 1 of 24 , Dec 7 7:38 AMView Source*******There's a story from somewhere that Steiner used alcohol in his
thirties to erase the psychic ability he was born with, because he couldn't
control it and so wanted to strart out with none and re-develop it. However,
I've never read he himself saying anything like that---- not even in his
autobiography, written as he lay dying, where you'd think if he'd done
anything like that he wouldn't be shy about admitting it by then.
Unfortunately, there are so many stories about him which arre of doubtful
>Subject: Re: [steiner] Re: People who "channel"
>Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 01:23:53 EST
>In a message dated 11/25/2006 3:31:42 P.M. Central Standard Time,
>*******No,I don't think SHE chose it! Iit was given to her because of her
>one-sided self-righteousness. And that was before she put that big ego
>a personality fragment and started calling it 'Ramtha", as the alcoholic
>Jane Roberts years before had done with her imaginary 'Seth'.
>*********Starman, didn't Steiner himself succomb to alcohol to tune out
>own psychic stuff? I don't know enough about Jane Roberts and don't have
>Ask the wild bee what the druids knew. ~Old English Adage
Get the latest Windows Live Messenger 8.1 Beta version.�Join now.
... Dear Starman, Gifted woman (Eliz/told about in earler post re-personal predictions) used to have Shining Lady tv show. My original UC goal was to studyMessage 1 of 24 , Dec 9 2:29 AMView Source--- In email@example.com, Cheeseandsalsa@... wrote:
> In a message dated 11/25/2006 3:31:42 P.M. Central Standard Time,Dear Starman,
> DrStarman wrote...
> Jane Roberts years before had done with her imaginary Seth 'Starman
Gifted woman (Eliz/told about in earler post re-personal
predictions) used to have "Shining Lady" tv show. My original UC
goal was to study her as Dr. Bro had Cayce. As previously stated,
did not have enough "bearings" to succeed. She lived in Ca and I
would not go live there (too afraid of Cayce's predictions). She
hosted seminar w/Drs.Krippner/Cerminara/Hynek. Later, Dr.K told me
she never received recognition she deserved. Reason I'm mentioning
this is because on one of her shows, someone asked about Jane
Roberts. Eliz said she knew her and that "She was quite a remarkable
Start my book out speaking of her,
"Elizabeth, how do you know these things?"
"Nina, I see pictures, I hear things, I just know."
David Wilcock shares a great deal about Seth online. Best
understanding is that he was a 5th dimensional being in contact with
Jane (he appears to look like grey ET's Streiber wrote about). Shift
of the Ages, Ch 4 on Breath of the Divine and Superstring
Theory/Science of Oneness, Ch 14 on Vedic Yoga, Seth and Multi-
dimensional Cosmology.(Vedic concept of trutis is literally
identical to Consciousness units.)
One quote he shared peaked my curiosity. Am elementary Steiner
student but this one from Seth sounded deep:
"There are electromagnetic structures, so to speak, that are
presently beyond your scientific instruments, units that are the
basic carriers of perception." also, "...the fetus utilizes these
units. So does any consciousness including that of a plant. Cells
are not just responsive to light because this is the order of
things, but because an emotional desire to perceive light is
Have "NATURE'S OPEN SECRET: Intro to Goethe's Scientific Writings"
but have not read it yet.
Felt had to honor Elizabeth and share the above. Any and all Steiner
pointers welcome, will thank you in advance - NINA
... and pray, create peacefulness within so there can be peace outside.NINA Dear Group, Was aware when wrote above that it reflected an attitude of divisionMessage 1 of 24 , Dec 13 2:30 AMView Source
>Dear Starman,and pray, create peacefulness within so there can be peace outside.NINA
>I'm not a dingbat.
> Yes, let's watch for deceptions, guard our own thoughts, meditate
Was aware when wrote above that it reflected an attitude of division
(imply that others characterized as "dingbats" are inferior). Wrote
Starman privately but that did nothing for vibes sent here. Something
important got lost in shuffle when trying to "justify". "Yes, Nina ,
follow your own advice."... I'm sorry - ME
Realize how vast the topic is. When reading "According to Luke", about
Elijah, Dr.Steiner said:"Elijah was one such being whose I-being could
not penetrate his physical body. As I said earlier, such personalities
were said to be "filled with the Holy Spirit." He went on to describe
more how Elijah was different: "External forces influence the
developing physical beings to such an extent that the individualities
in question incarnate as inspired, ecstatic or seemingly spirit-driven
personalities whose knowledge greatly exceeds the capacity of their
ordinary intelligence.Every Old Testament prophet was such a
personality...Personalities like this retreat into solitude from time
to time. The portion of the I that is used by the persoanlity then
withdraws, inducing ecstatic and unconscious states, and the spirit
speaks into the person from outside. Elijah was especially receptive
to inspiration from above. His actions, his speech, his gestures
originated not only in the part of the I that inhabited his body but
also in divine-spiritual beings who disclosed themselves through him."
"The mighty words Elijah spoke in the ninth century before Christ were
actually God's words and his gestures God's gestures.Something similar
was true of John the Baptist, since Elijah's experience was
reenlivened in him."
"The Luke Gospel speaks vividly of John, introducing us to the true
being of another individuality of the early Christian era. We
familiarize oursselves with the Gospels only when we rise to an
understanding of each word's intended meaning. Luke's introduction
states that he will recount the communications of 'independent
seers'.These independent seers,however, did not simply see events on
the physical plane. They saw the true circumstances that were
gradually revealed through the ages."
... of her one-sided self-righteousness. And that was before she put that big ego into a personality fragment and started calling it Ramtha , as theMessage 1 of 24 , Jan 24, 2007View Source
> In a message dated 11/25/2006 3:31:42 P.M. Central Standard Time,of her one-sided self-righteousness. And that was before she put that
> DrStarman@... writes:
> *******No,I don't think SHE chose it! Iit was given to her because
big ego into a personality fragment and started calling it 'Ramtha",
as the alcoholic Jane Roberts years before had done with her
Welcome back! While you were on your honeymoon, I spoke with a friend
who is on a Seth list. She said Jane Roberts was NOT an alcoholic. Can
you please share your source with me so can share it with her? Thanks -