Hello Yvonne and Roger: Unfortunately I only received Yvonne s reply to you and not your original posting, Roger. This has confirmed the feeling I have hadMessage 1 of 7 , Feb 12View SourceHello Yvonne and Roger:Unfortunately I only received Yvonne's reply to you and not your original posting, Roger. This has confirmed the feeling I have had that I don't receive all the messages that come from the group. I see answers and I am pretty sure I have never seen the original and this has proved my suspicions.My husband is descended from the Stroud family who married into the Grants and over the years I have done quite a bit of research. Unfortunately, due to family circumstances I am unable to do research at the moment. However, when I read your messages I felt sure I had something in my records that gave the background to why the Grants went to St Helena. I don't know where I got this from but I have a copy of Benjamin Grant's obituary (who was the father of Louisa Palmer G) taken from the Parish Magazine in 1926. I attach a copy.Benjamin's father was Charles Grant born Winchester in 1806. Can you imagine leaving one of your children behind on an isolated island knowing you would never see him again? It just proves how different life was then.Hope this helpsRegardsVivien
>I am a descendant of Louisa Palmer Grant and can give you a brief resume of her descendants if you are still interested. I'm afraid I know nothing of her past. Thank you for giving me the names of her parents, it was one of my 'brick walls'
>Roger Sunderland wrote:
> I am currently researching my family tree whichincludes my Gt,Gt Grandfather Charles Grant born Winchester c1806 and in particular his sixth born William Grant Born c1852 on St Helena.
> Thequestions i am searching for are the reasons for there move from Winchester Hants and any background to there time there other siblings according to census reports are
> 1. Caroline,2. Benjamine 3.Sarah F,4. Henry, 5.Louisa6.Wiliam, 7.John, 8.Alfred
>Louisa Palmer Grant, who may be #5. Louisa [above]. I have no information on William. Hope this is of help.
> I have one small mention of
>Richard Augustus LEGG on 18 June 1895 at St. Matthew¢s Church, St. Helena.
> Louisa Palmer GRANT md.
> At the time of her marriage to Richard LEGG, Louisa was listed as a 25year old spinster, living at the Briars, St. Helena. The witnesses to the marriage were Charles E. S. GRANT and Suzette STROUD.
>Helena, Registrar General's Office, Civil Registration 1852-1936
> Filmedby the Genealogical Society of Utah, 1981.
> FHL/LDS Film #1259105Record #1489
>Alarm House. She is buried St. Paul¢s East Baptist Cemetery/Knollcombs .Her gravestone inscription is recorded as: In loving memory of Louisa Palma LEGG, wife of R. A. LEGG, Alarm House, who departed this life on 9th Dec 1935 aged 64 years.
> She d. 9 December 1935, at
> The civil death registration gives her age as 66 years.The informant at her death was Arthur JOSHUA, of Half Tree Hollow.
> St. Helena. Registrar General¢s Office, Civil Registration Deaths1857-1936.
> FHL/LDS Film #1259106.Gravestones and Memorials on St. Helena 1686-1975
> Comp. by the 5thand 6th year pupils of the Secondary Selective Schoo
> FHL/LDS Film#1259106
Hello Vivien You probably do get the emails but they end up in your inbox way earlier than you are looking... I have this problem too... my inbox says I have 2Message 1 of 7 , Feb 12View SourceHello Vivien
You probably do get the emails but they end up in your inbox way earlier
than you are looking... I have this problem too... my inbox says I have
2 or 3 unread messages but they are high up the list and off the
screen... I think this is because the list is moderated and the emails
are 'held up' until the moderator approves them but they are listed on
your screen with the time of original sending by the poster, not the
time the moderator sends them on.
On 13/02/2013 1:06 AM, Viv Chandler wrote:
> [Attachment(s) <#TopText> from Viv Chandler included below]
> Hello Yvonne and Roger:
> Unfortunately I only received Yvonne's reply to you and not your
> original posting, Roger. This has confirmed the feeling I have had that
> I don't receive all the messages that come from the group. I see
> answers and I am pretty sure I have never seen the original and this has
> proved my suspicions.