Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
Browse Groups

• I think it is important that everyone remember that: Cardiac output = HR * stroke volume The ejection fraction is not in the equation. Stroke volume increases
Message 1 of 4 , Mar 1, 2009
View Source
I think it is important that everyone remember that:

Cardiac output = HR * stroke volume

The ejection fraction is not in the equation.

Stroke volume increases if there is an increase in end-systolic volume
or a decrease in end-diastolic volume. The ejection fraction is simply
a function of these.

A normal heart has an ejection fraction above 60%. Ejection fractions
lower than 60% mean the person is starting to have heart failure.
Ejection fractions less than 50% are associated with increased
mortality and ejection fractions less then 40% represent moderate to
severe heart failure.

If you start at 60% ejection fraction, it is impossible to double it
to 120%. This is why Carl Foster said the most liberal estimate would
be from 60% to 80%. Note that this is a 33% increase and not a 60%-80%
increase as Catherine Bacon says below.

And of course, there is the increased a-v extraction noted by previous
answers.

So, to keep it simple, the increase in VO2max comes partly from an
increase in cardiac output (which comes because of a mix of an
increase in stroke volume and HR), and an and partly from an increase
in a-v extraction.

Of course, we don't usually exercise at VO2max so the changes with
exercise may be very different when exercising at VO2 max vs
submaximal exercise. I went looking for a table at VO2max but couldn't
get one online. Here is a table from a paper in JAP in 2009 in middle-
aged men cycling at 60-65% of VO2max. Note that most of the increase
in stroke volume does come from ejection fraction in this table, and
cardiac output increases are therefore due to HR and "ejection-
fraction related increases in stroke volume". At very high heart rates
experienced at VO2max, there is less time for the heart to fill, end-
systolic volume therefore decreases, and this leads to decreases in
stroke volume (not sure if ejection fraction declines but I think so).
• The study I referenced earlier is listed below. There were other data contemporary with this, by Steven Rerych for Duke, that was substantially similar. I
Message 1 of 4 , Mar 1, 2009
View Source

The study I referenced earlier is listed below.   There were other data contemporary with this, by Steven Rerych for Duke, that was substantially similar.  I think the citation was Annals of Surgery, but not sure without going to find it.

To get a VO2 of 6L, assuming 15 gm% hgb concentration, you have an a-v O2 difference of 150 ml/L.

Therefore in terms of the Fick equation

VO2=CO*a-v O2difference

6000=CO*150

CO=40 L/min

CO=HR*SV=HR*EDV*EF

40000ml=200*EDV*0.8

40000=EDV*160

EDV=250 ml

This is a big heart, but not out of the range of what is reported (or calculated ) from literature values.

More than a generation ago, the Swedes used green dye and reported occasional CO values of 40 L/min in athletes.

Assuming a resting VO2 of 300 ml/min, a HR of 50, an EF of 0.6 and an a-vO2 difference of 50 ml/L

300=CO*50

CO=6 L/min

6000 ml/min = 50*0.6*EDV

EDV=200 ml

Thus, in terms of the original question

HR*4

avO2 difference *3

EF*1.33

EDV*1.25

CO*4*1.33*1.25=6.65

SV*1.66

Reference

AnholmJD, Foster C, Carpenter J, Pollock ML, Hellman CK, Schmidt DH:  Effect of habitual exercise on the left ventricular response to exercise.  J Appl Physiol 52: 1648-1651, 1982.

Carl Foster

From: sportscience@yahoogroups.com [mailto:sportscience@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ian Shrier
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 6:13 AM
To: sportscience@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Difficulty explaining VO2max

I think it is important that everyone remember that:

Cardiac output = HR * stroke volume

The ejection fraction is not in the equation.

Stroke volume increases if there is an increase in end-systolic volume
or a decrease in end-diastolic volume. The ejection fraction is simply
a function of these.

A normal heart has an ejection fraction above 60%. Ejection fractions
lower than 60% mean the person is starting to have heart failure.
Ejection fractions less than 50% are associated with increased
mortality and ejection fractions less then 40% represent moderate to
severe heart failure.

If you start at 60% ejection fraction, it is impossible to double it
to 120%. This is why Carl Foster said the most liberal estimate would
be from 60% to 80%. Note that this is a 33% increase and not a 60%-80%
increase as Catherine Bacon says below.

And of course, there is the increased a-v extraction noted by previous
answers.

So, to keep it simple, the increase in VO2max comes partly from an
increase in cardiac output (which comes because of a mix of an
increase in stroke volume and HR), and an and partly from an increase
in a-v extraction.

Of course, we don't usually exercise at VO2max so the changes with
exercise may be very different when exercising at VO2 max vs
submaximal exercise. I went looking for a table at VO2max but couldn't
get one online. Here is a table from a paper in JAP in 2009 in middle-
aged men cycling at 60-65% of VO2max. Note that most of the increase
in stroke volume does come from ejection fraction in this table, and
cardiac output increases are therefore due to HR and "ejection-
fraction related increases in stroke volume". At very high heart rates
experienced at VO2max, there is less time for the heart to fill, end-
systolic volume therefore decreases, and this leads to decreases in
stroke volume (not sure if ejection fraction declines but I think so).

Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.