Review can be treated as a Verification mechanism to ensure that work
products are as per the standards and meets all the required criteria.
Audits are needed to ensure that the inconsistencies in the review process /
work products were properly closed and the process/documents are properly
following the procedures. It is consistent with the adopted workflow.
Audits are a validation mechanism.
From: RamanathanS [mailto:ramanathans@...
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:46 AM
Subject: [SPI] Work product audit VS Peer Review
I would be greatful if someone can through some light on work product audits
and peer reviews.
when are these audit performed? what is being reviewed? what would be the
major differences between these two techniques?
Thanks in advance
Yahoo Group home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spi
or to me at email@example.com
Unsubscribe by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/