Browse Groups

• ## [Speed cubing group] Re: Multisolves

(4)
• NextPrevious
• P.S. Since the 6x6x6 has been discussed recently, I thought it would also be worth noting that while the 4x4x4 and 5x5x5 have just two multisolves each, the
Jun 1, 2005 1 of 4
View Source
P.S. Since the 6x6x6 has been discussed recently, I
thought it would also be worth noting that while the
4x4x4 and 5x5x5 have just two multisolves each, the
6x6x6 would have 18 possible multisolves. Now I REALLY
can't wait to get one!

--- keggerius <keggerius@...> wrote:

> Hey everybody! For a while now I've been working on
> improving my methods for solving the 4x4x4 and 5x5x5
> two different ways, or what I like to call a
> "multisolve".
>
> For those who aren't familiar with this, I'll
> explain:
> the 4x4x4 can be scrambled as a 2x2x2 or a 3x3x3,
> and
> the 5x5x5 can be scrambled as a 3x3x3 in two
> different
> ways. By scrambling the puzzle first one way and
> then
> the other, and then solving in reverse order, the
> puzzle becomes a "custom" 2x2x2 or 3x3x3 that has
> different "pieces" every time. Especially
> challenging
> are the two cases that require orienting the centers
> in the first stage of the solve. I will refer to
> these
> as the "hard" cases, and the other two as the "easy"
> cases.
>
> I find multisolves to be very fun, and also quite
> addictive to try to improve on, because of the
> greater
> challenges they provide in piece recognition.
> Because
> speedcubing.com has records from only 3 or 4 other
> people in these categories, I must assume that few
> people have ever tried multisolves, probably because
> they never even considered them. It would be great
> to
> get some more people interested, and compare times
> and
> methods.
>
> Anyway, here are my best times for all four types:
>
> 4x4x4 easy case
> (scramble as 3x3x3, then as 2x2x2)
> 1:15.84
>
> 4x4x4 hard case
> (scramble as 2x2x2, then as 3x3x3)
> 2:24.77
>
> 5x5x5 easy case
> (scramble using only outer layers, then both layers)
> 1:45.95
>
> 5x5x5 hard case
> (scramble using both layers, then only outer layers)
> 2:45.06
>
> Except for the 4x4x4 easy case, these times are by
> far
> the fastest I know of. While that's great, it simply
> doesn't seem right when you consider that
> multisolves
> are basically 2x2x2 and 3x3x3 solves, and there are
> dozens of active members in this group alone who can
> beat me in those categories by a wide margin. So, in
> order to rectify this: I DARE anyone to beat my
> times!
> That should do it. Now to sit back and await my
> comeuppance, which will no doubt be arriving
> shortly.
>
> -Ben B.
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Discover Yahoo!
> Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for
> the weekend. Check it out!
> http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html
>
>

__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM and more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/online.html
• ... .. wrote: I just gave it a try and it s indeed fun. I used two scrambles from the Sunday contest for each case and I write them in the order I did them
Jun 1, 2005 1 of 4
View Source
--- In speedsolvingrubikscube@yahoogroups.com, keggerius <keggerius@y.
..> wrote:

I just gave it a try and it's indeed fun. I used two scrambles from
the Sunday contest for each case and I write them in the order I did
them (and the my number of attempts).

> 5x5x5 easy case
> (scramble using only outer layers, then both layers)
> 1:45.95

2:11.55 (2)

> 4x4x4 easy case
> (scramble as 3x3x3, then as 2x2x2)
> 1:15.84

1:05.49 (1)

> 4x4x4 hard case
> (scramble as 2x2x2, then as 3x3x3)
> 2:24.77

8:22.43 (1)
The first 1.5 minutes or so I had no idea what to do ;-)

> 5x5x5 hard case
> (scramble using both layers, then only outer layers)
> 2:45.06

7:26.68 (1)
This is truly fun :-) Once you get to the second phase it's such a
relief...

I know I've seen them on SCC but I can't find them anymore. Where are
they?

Cheers!
Stefan
• Damn... tried another hard multi-5x5 and was much faster but screwed up permuting the LL edges of the first phase... Btw, I just remembered Grant was clever
Jun 1, 2005 1 of 4
View Source
Damn... tried another hard multi-5x5 and was much faster but screwed
up permuting the LL edges of the first phase...

Btw, I just remembered Grant was clever enough to exploit this a while
ago in the 100th edition of the weekly online Japanese Speedcubing
Contest:
http://ksuehiro.hp.infoseek.co.jp/100kaikenenb.htm
(look at his great times for 4x4)

Cheers!
Stefan
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.