> I will be looking into it, but the fact that they define the noise
> terms of "RMS" is not a good sign, that averaging makes the numbers
> look better than reality. I believe that that part will have more
> noise than a ICS601 has that people complain about although they
> not tried it.
I have tried the ICS devices with results similar of that one of the
Cardinal Oscillators , published from Clifton Labs ,digging deepest
near the carrier with my HP8563E.