Hi, Annie! ... There is no need for uri() call, because namespace is fixed for all uddi calls. ... Looks like they realy change it. 0.50 gives me error,
Message 1 of 2
, Jun 19, 2001
--- In soaplite@y..., aclarkdc@y... wrote:
> Why in the UDDI examples is there no call to uri() but instead just
> a call to proxy()? I thought both were needed.
There is no need for uri() call, because namespace is fixed for all
> Also, does anyone know
> if MS changed their UDDI site -- suddenly my UDDI examples aren't
> working anymore (e.g., I get a "The request element <FindBusiness
> xmlns:urn:uddi-org:api> was not recognized when I run inquire1.pl).
Looks like they realy change it. 0.50 gives me error, because MS's
UDDI site expects text/xml; charset="utf-8" and UDDI::Lite didn't
send it. I don't have problem with current development version which
does send charset. You can fix it in your version following example
in SOAP Cookbook (http://cookbook.soaplite.com). Yet I can't get an
error you've got. Hope it helps.
Best wishes, Paul.
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer.
We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.