Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
Browse Groups

• Dear Laren Following are values of delta T which I have calculated: 3008BC : 23 Hours 46 min 5502BC : 2 days 9 hours,17 min 9102BC : 5 days 11 hours 9 min
Message 1 of 26 , Apr 4, 2008
View Source
Dear Laren
Following are values of delta T which I have calculated:
3008BC : 23 Hours 46 min
5502BC : 2 days 9 hours,17 min
9102BC : 5 days 11 hours 9 min
13902BC : 11 days 12 hours 51 min
These match with Indian history.
Prafulla

--- In skymap@yahoogroups.com, Laren Dart <sandman@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks Chris,
>
> I know different programs use different formulas for dT. There
isn't
> really any way to be accurate, anyway. The Difference of Time is
> basically an o-c residual in lunar theory. For all the talk about
> "the tidal term," I've never seen any calculated values for what
the
> tidal coupling between Moon and Earth should be. There's no way I
> could calculate it, but the Earth-Moon parameters should be known
> well enough to at least get a reasonable estimate from some expert
on
> the subject. I got hooked on delta T back in the mid-70s, and
have
> turned into a real dT addict! :-)
>
> Have you ever seen a table of approximate calculated values for
the
> tidal coupling?
>
> Regards,
> Laren
>
> At 12:37 PM 3/18/2008, you wrote:
>
>
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Laren Dart" <<mailto:sandman%40got.net>sandman@...>
> >To: <<mailto:skymap%40yahoogroups.com>skymap@yahoogroups.com>
> >Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 6:44 PM
> >Subject: Re: [skymap] Re: Accuracy of delta T
> >
> >Hi Laren,
> >
> >
> >Before 948AD the formula used is:
> >
> >B = (dJE - 948.0)/100.0;
> >ans = (46.5 * B - 405.0) * B + 1830.0;
> >
> >Between 948 and 1620, the formula is:
> >
> >B = (dJE - 1850.0)/100.0;
> >ans = 22.5 * B * B;
> >
> >where:
> >
> >dJE = 2000.0 + (dJD - J2000)/365.25;
> >
> >(dJD is the current Julian day number)
> >
> >In both these cases, a correction is applied:
> >
> >T = (dJD - J2000)/36525.0;
> >ans += 0.6 - 0.6*T - 2*T*T;
> >
> >to avvount for the difference in the Moon's secular acceleration
assumed by
> >Stephenson and Houlden and that used by the ELP2000 lunar
ephemeris, which
> >SkyMap uses.
> >
> >After 1620, the tabulated values from the AA are used.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Chris
> >
> >
>
>
> Laren Dart
> http://ldart.got.net
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
• ... From: prafulla Vaman Mendki To: Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:36 PM Subject: [skymap] Re:
Message 1 of 26 , Apr 4, 2008
View Source
----- Original Message -----
From: "prafulla Vaman Mendki" <prafulla_mendki@...>
To: <skymap@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:36 PM
Subject: [skymap] Re: Accuracy of delta T

> Dear Laren
> Following are values of delta T which I have calculated:
> 3008BC : 23 Hours 46 min
> 5502BC : 2 days 9 hours,17 min
> 9102BC : 5 days 11 hours 9 min
> 13902BC : 11 days 12 hours 51 min
> These match with Indian history.
> Prafulla

Prafulla,

I don't mean to offend your religious beliefs, but in fairness to the
members of this group, I have to warn people that, in my considered opinion,
your treatment of the Indian epics such as the "Mahabharata" as literal
historical documents, describing real events which can be precisely dated,
is of extremely dubious veracity. The view of "mainstream" historians is
that these are "oral" epics, very like those traditionally attributed to
Homer, and were composed at approximately the same sort of time (somewhere
between about the 8th and 6th centuries, BC).

To regard their descriptions of events dating back to 13,000 BC as anything
other than myth is, I think, unsupportable, especially in light of
archeological evidence placing the oldest human civilizations as those of
southern Iraq (around what is now the Shatt-al-arab waterway) in around 5000
BC (the Sumarian civilization of cities such as Ur), while the oldest known
cities in India are those of the Indus Valley civilization in modern day
Pakistan, which flourished from around 3300-1700 BC.

You are welcome to your views, of course, but I cannot allow them to be put
forward on this mailing list as "scientific" calculations without a "health
warning" such as this.

I do not wish to discuss this matter further - it is way off topic for this
group. Anyone interested should consult appropriate historical references.

Thank you,

Chris
• Chris, As someone who has been researching Delta T for many years, I thank you for this responce. I received email from this person on the same subject and
Message 1 of 26 , Apr 4, 2008
View Source
Chris,

As someone who has been researching Delta T for many years, I thank
you for this responce. I received email from this person on the
same subject and promptly trashed it. I try to keep an open mind,
but there is a limit!

Laren

At 01:22 PM 4/4/2008, you wrote:

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "prafulla Vaman Mendki"
><<mailto:prafulla_mendki%40yahoo.co.in>prafulla_mendki@...>
>To: <<mailto:skymap%40yahoogroups.com>skymap@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:36 PM
>Subject: [skymap] Re: Accuracy of delta T
>
> > Dear Laren
> > Following are values of delta T which I have calculated:
> > 3008BC : 23 Hours 46 min
> > 5502BC : 2 days 9 hours,17 min
> > 9102BC : 5 days 11 hours 9 min
> > 13902BC : 11 days 12 hours 51 min
> > These match with Indian history.
> > Prafulla
>
>Prafulla,
>
>I don't mean to offend your religious beliefs, but in fairness to the
>members of this group, I have to warn people that, in my considered opinion,
>your treatment of the Indian epics such as the "Mahabharata" as literal
>historical documents, describing real events which can be precisely dated,
>is of extremely dubious veracity. The view of "mainstream" historians is
>that these are "oral" epics, very like those traditionally attributed to
>Homer, and were composed at approximately the same sort of time (somewhere
>between about the 8th and 6th centuries, BC).
>
>To regard their descriptions of events dating back to 13,000 BC as anything
>other than myth is, I think, unsupportable, especially in light of
>archeological evidence placing the oldest human civilizations as those of
>southern Iraq (around what is now the Shatt-al-arab waterway) in around 5000
>BC (the Sumarian civilization of cities such as Ur), while the oldest known
>cities in India are those of the Indus Valley civilization in modern day
>Pakistan, which flourished from around 3300-1700 BC.
>
>You are welcome to your views, of course, but I cannot allow them to be put
>forward on this mailing list as "scientific" calculations without a "health
>warning" such as this.
>
>I do not wish to discuss this matter further - it is way off topic for this
>group. Anyone interested should consult appropriate historical references.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Chris
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG.
>Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.5/1359 - Release Date:
>4/4/2008 8:23 AM

Laren Dart
http://ldart.got.net

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
• Dear Chris I have calculated delta T using mathematical formulae. There is no relegious matter. If you have calculated any values of delta T ,pl. let me know.
Message 1 of 26 , Apr 6, 2008
View Source
Dear Chris
I have calculated delta T using mathematical formulae.
There is no relegious matter.
If you have calculated any values of delta T ,pl. let me know.
Archeology has already found old city of Dwarka and also river
Sarswati which had disappeared 5000 years ago.
However the question under discussion was not Mahabharata or
archeology Indian history.
If you have calculated any figures of delta T for this period
pl.let me know.

--- In skymap@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Marriott" <chris@...> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "prafulla Vaman Mendki" <prafulla_mendki@...>
> To: <skymap@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:36 PM
> Subject: [skymap] Re: Accuracy of delta T
>
>
> > Dear Laren
> > Following are values of delta T which I have calculated:
> > 3008BC : 23 Hours 46 min
> > 5502BC : 2 days 9 hours,17 min
> > 9102BC : 5 days 11 hours 9 min
> > 13902BC : 11 days 12 hours 51 min
> > These match with Indian history.
> > Prafulla
>
> Prafulla,
>
> I don't mean to offend your religious beliefs, but in fairness to
the
> members of this group, I have to warn people that, in my
considered opinion,
> your treatment of the Indian epics such as the "Mahabharata" as
literal
> historical documents, describing real events which can be
precisely dated,
> is of extremely dubious veracity. The view of "mainstream"
historians is
> that these are "oral" epics, very like those traditionally
attributed to
> Homer, and were composed at approximately the same sort of time
(somewhere
> between about the 8th and 6th centuries, BC).
>
> To regard their descriptions of events dating back to 13,000 BC as
anything
> other than myth is, I think, unsupportable, especially in light of
> archeological evidence placing the oldest human civilizations as
those of
> southern Iraq (around what is now the Shatt-al-arab waterway) in
around 5000
> BC (the Sumarian civilization of cities such as Ur), while the
oldest known
> cities in India are those of the Indus Valley civilization in
modern day
> Pakistan, which flourished from around 3300-1700 BC.
>
> You are welcome to your views, of course, but I cannot allow them
to be put
> forward on this mailing list as "scientific" calculations without
a "health
> warning" such as this.
>
> I do not wish to discuss this matter further - it is way off topic
for this
> group. Anyone interested should consult appropriate historical
references.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Chris
>
• From: prafulla Vaman Mendki ... In mathematical terms the problem is one of *extrapolation*. If you have a formula y=f(t)
Message 1 of 26 , Apr 7, 2008
View Source
From: "prafulla Vaman Mendki" <prafulla_mendki@...>

> I have calculated delta T using mathematical formulae.
> There is no relegious matter...

In mathematical terms the problem is one of *extrapolation*. If you have a
formula y=f(t) which fits data giving good values of y for some range of t,
but know nothing outside that range, then you must *never* use the formula
outside that range.

The reason is that there is an infinite number of formulae which will fit
data within a range, but diverge (sometimes spectacularly) outside that
range. And the one which fits "best" within the range will not turn out
to be the best outside the known range.

[If you know something about the expected form of f(t) outside the range,
then you can cautiously relax the "never", but in that case it becomes an
"untested prediction" instead of a "random guess"- it still isn't fact or
even a "calculation".]

Extrapolation of mathematical correlations therefore becomes a matter of
faith, rather than of science. And any "data" you refer to at the dates
you mention (and certainly to the accuracy you want) is also a matter of
faith rather than of science.

SkyMap's success is based on it being firmly rooted in science, not faith.
It has to be. Science is based on tests which anyone can do, and get the
same answer. Faith is something which is different for everyone, so a
single computer program cannot cover it.

Dave
David Webber
Author of 'Mozart the Music Processor'
http://www.mozart.co.uk
For discussion/support see
http://www.mozart.co.uk/mozartists/mailinglist.htm
• Reply to : Laren Dart ... Where did you find that ? I can t find it in Skymap Pro 10, and it s not in the list of new features for Skymap Pro 11. -- Richard
Message 1 of 26 , Apr 10, 2008
View Source
Reply to : Laren Dart
>
> Got it! I thought I found it once, but couldn't find it again. I'll
> try entering the delta T from Guide and see what happens. Guide
> allows entering different formulas for different periods of time,
> but doesn't allow entering individual values the way SM does. Both
> ways are very useful to me.
>
Where did you find that ? I can't find it in Skymap Pro 10, and it's
not in the list of new features for Skymap Pro 11.

--
Richard Mallett
Eaton Bray, Dunstable
South Beds. UK
• Richard, I spent ten minutes trying to find it again. Help | Eclipse settings has a great image of the dialogue panel, but doesn t give a clue where to find
Message 1 of 26 , Apr 10, 2008
View Source
Richard,

I spent ten minutes trying to find it again. Help | Eclipse settings
has a great image of the dialogue panel, but doesn't give a clue
where to find it. I found it, you have to have a map showing. Then
click Map | Eclipse settings. But any program that makes an
experienced user have trouble finding a feature is not terribly
impressive. I've used Guide since 2000, strictly for eclipses, and

Laren

At 11:05 AM 4/10/2008, you wrote:

>Reply to : Laren Dart
> >
> > Got it! I thought I found it once, but couldn't find it again. I'll
> > try entering the delta T from Guide and see what happens. Guide
> > allows entering different formulas for different periods of time,
> > but doesn't allow entering individual values the way SM does. Both
> > ways are very useful to me.
> >
>Where did you find that ? I can't find it in Skymap Pro 10, and it's
>not in the list of new features for Skymap Pro 11.
>
>--
>Richard Mallett
>Eaton Bray, Dunstable
>South Beds. UK
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG.
>Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.11/1371 - Release Date:
>4/10/2008 12:23 PM

Laren Dart
http://ldart.got.net

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
• ... It s not a new feature - it s been there for a number of versions. Display a solar eclipse map. On the map window, go to the Map menu and select the
Message 1 of 26 , Apr 10, 2008
View Source
Quoting Richard Mallett <100114.573@...>:

> Where did you find that ? I can't find it in Skymap Pro 10, and it's
> not in the list of new features for Skymap Pro 11.

It's not a new feature - it's been there for a number of versions.

Display a solar eclipse map. On the map window, go to the "Map" menu
and select the "Eclipse Settings" dialog.

Regards,

Chris
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.