has anyone successfully run Self 4.x on an ARM architecture? -- Jeremiah S. JunkenMessage 1 of 60 , Dec 5 5:36 PMView Sourcehas anyone successfully run Self 4.x on an ARM architecture?
Jeremiah S. Junken
Think varargs: value: x = (value) allows blocks and others to ignore arguments they don t care about. Take care, -- David (tapped out on my iPhone; blame itMessage 60 of 60 , Dec 22 9:21 AMView SourceThink varargs: value: x = (value) allows blocks and others to ignore arguments they don't care about.Take care,
-- David (tapped out on my iPhone; blame it for any typoze;-)
On Dec 22, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Thorsten Dittmar <thormar@...> wrote:
Hello David,for the object 17 and the method value it makes sense, but the object 17 and the method value: x it doesn't make so much sense. I always get a little bit nervous, when an object can response to a meaningless message. In our case it will answer again 17 because value: x is implemented as "self value". It would prefer to get an error, because it is much more difficult to find an error in a system that "works".anyhow, I got your intention and that was what I was asking for. Thx for answeringbest regardsthorstenOn Dec 22, 2011, at 5:43 PM, David Ungar wrote:What is the value of 17? Or of 'foo' ? We thought it made sense that the value of 17 is 17.That way you can write: max: x = ( > x ifTrue: self IfFalse: x )without square brackets. The value method gets inlined out, anyway.After all, 17 knows it's not a block.
- David (from iPad, typos likely)
On Dec 22, 2011, at 8:12 AM, Thorsten Dittmar <thormar@...> wrote:
I was always wondering why value and value with parameters was implemented in defaultBehavior and not in the trait block. Of course, that can make some stuff easier, but it looks a little bit like a dirty hack. Would be nice, if somebody can tell me a little bit the background of this implementation.