Thanks, Dane! How about this (for only $5.50!):Message 1 of 37 , Sep 3, 2008View SourceThanks, Dane!
How about this (for only $5.50!):
This is gonna work, right?
The general public derives their sense of risk from the news media and common sense . Unfortunately, neither is a reliable source of information. On Mon, SepMessage 37 of 37 , Sep 15, 2008View SourceThe general public derives their sense of risk from the news media and "common sense".
Unfortunately, neither is a reliable source of information.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Mighk Wilson <mwilson@...> wrote:
>> A lot of this gets back to Ken Kifer's (I think it was him) comment
about cars being dangerous and bikes (and pedestrians) being vulnerable.
Many people tell me they will not ride their bikes because it is
I've found that many (most?) people do not understand the difference
between "dangerous," "vulnerable" and "risk."
While cyclists are indeed quite vulnerable, the risk of being harmed
while cycling is quite low if the cyclist rides competently, maintains
his/her machine properly, and obeys the rules of the road.
I find myself getting less and less impressed with the intelligence of
my fellow Americans as the years go by. They know far more about
Britney Spears than about things that matter.
"It's not getting any smarter out there. You have to come to terms with
stupidity, and make it work for you."
-- Frank Zappa