On Wednesday, April 03, 2013 3:31 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> Seems reasonable, though I had to read it twice to
> appreciate that non-URNish URIs may also be registered.
> It might be reasonable to underline this point by having
> the example registration (not the registration of the
> example, which is different, though currently the same text)
> in §3 register an http://example.com/profiles/example
> instead of the urn:ietf:params:profile:example.
> Obviously the §5.2 registration should stay the same.
Thanks a lot for the feedback Dave. Ill try to make this clearer in the