hello nathan. ... honestly, i think such a comment would probably confuse more people than it would help. @rev never was a popular idea to begin with and only
Message 1 of 3
, Oct 9, 2012
On 2012-10-09 13:21 , Nathan wrote:
> Looks good and most useful, is it worth mentioning anywhere that this
> inverse relations(describes being the inverse of describedby) is now
> needed due to @rev falling out of fashion? It may help explain why
> describes wasn't defined by powder in the first instance.
honestly, i think such a comment would probably confuse more people than
it would help. @rev never was a popular idea to begin with and only part
of relatively few vocabularies.
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer.
We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.