Browse Groups

• ## Re: [PrimeNumbers] Factor Convergence Conjecture

(2)
• NextPrevious
• It is not clear what you mean by converges to in your statement. Definition : A sequence s converges to a point x if for any neighborhood V of x almost all
Jul 16, 2012 1 of 2
View Source
It is not clear what you mean by "converges to" in your statement.

Definition : A sequence s converges to a point x if for any neighborhood V
of x almost all terms of s lie within V.

I think in spite of the unclear definition i can give a
Counter-example to what you say:

let p=2, a=3 <=> L=3, m = [N/3] = [2q/3], b=3m <=> n=3m^2,

Then all of your inequalities are satisfied (as soon as q>3), but
a-n+m= 3 - 3m^2 + m
does not at all "converge" (whatever this may mean) to p=2.

Maximilian

> **
>
>
> Let N = pq be any semiprime such that a^2 < N < b^2 & p < q.
>
> Let 3l be the multiple of 3 nearer to a^2
> and 3m be the multiple of 3 nearer to N
> and 3n be the multiple of 3 nearer to b^2
>
> If (m - l) > (n - m) then
>
> (a - m - 3 + l) converges to 'p' else
>
> (a - n + m) converges to 'p'.
>
> Above conjecture will optimise the trial division method and Fermat's
> Factorisation method.
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.