Browse Groups

(1)
• NextPrevious
• This falls short of a proof about elementary differential definition of gamma function, but perhaps it will give insight as to why. For z not 0 or a negative
Message 1 of 1 , Aug 15, 2011
View Source
This falls short of a proof about elementary differential definition of
gamma function, but perhaps it will give insight as to why.

For z not 0 or a negative integer,

gamma(z) = integral(from 0 to infinity)(t^(z-1) e^(-t) dt)

= limit(m-->infinity)(evaluate between 0 and m)
((z-1)t^(z-2) - (z-1)(z-2)/2 t^(z-3) +((z-1)(z-2)(z-3)/3!)t^(z-4)
+ (z!/((z-5)! 4!))t^(z-5) - (z!/((z-6)! 5!)) t^(z-6) + ...)e^(-t)

= limit(m--> infinity)
((z-1)(-m)^(z-2) - (z-1)(z-2)/2 (-m)^(z-3)
+((z-1)(z-2)(z-3)/3!)(-m)^(z-4)
+ (z!/((z-5)! 4!))(-m)^(z-5)
- (z!/((z-6)! 5!)) (-m)^(z-6) + ...) * e^(-m)

Kermit
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.