--- In firstname.lastname@example.org
, "Jens Kruse Andersen" <jens.k.a@...> wrote:
> woodhodgson wrote:
> > --- In email@example.com, Tom Hadley <kctom99@> wrote:
> >> The first 25 primes do not make an admissible constellation. It is
> >> impossible to find that pattern repeated anywhere else.
> > That's why I quoted 23, ignoring the "special" first century. There is no
> > reason
> > to rule out the existence of some 23-tuple "inside" a century somewhere.
> Right. However, the densest admissible 23-tuples have width 94 but
> cannot be inside a century. They must start with a number which is
> 7 or 9 (mod 10) and then they will cross a multiple of 100.
> But there are admissible 23-tuples with width 96 which can be inside
> a century, for example
> The densest admissible 24-tuples have width 100 so they obviously
> don't fit inside a century.
> Jens Kruse Andersen
Thank you for the extra clarification.