Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
Browse Groups

• ... Thank you for the extra clarification.
Message 1 of 37 , Jun 3, 2011
View Source
--- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com, "Jens Kruse Andersen" <jens.k.a@...> wrote:
>
> woodhodgson wrote:
> > --- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com, Tom Hadley <kctom99@> wrote:
> >> The first 25 primes do not make an admissible constellation. It is
> >> impossible to find that pattern repeated anywhere else.
> >
> > That's why I quoted 23, ignoring the "special" first century. There is no
> > reason
> > to rule out the existence of some 23-tuple "inside" a century somewhere.
>
> Right. However, the densest admissible 23-tuples have width 94 but
> cannot be inside a century. They must start with a number which is
> 7 or 9 (mod 10) and then they will cross a multiple of 100.
> But there are admissible 23-tuples with width 96 which can be inside
> a century, for example
> {1,3,7,9,13,21,27,31,37,39,43,49,57,63,67,69,73,79,81,87,91,93,97}
>
> The densest admissible 24-tuples have width 100 so they obviously
> don't fit inside a century.
>
> --
> Jens Kruse Andersen
>

Thank you for the extra clarification.
• ... Congratulations! http://users.cybercity.dk/~dsl522332/math/simultprime.htm is updated. -- Jens Kruse Andersen
Message 37 of 37 , Dec 31 3:35 AM
View Source
Jaroslaw Wroblewski wrote:
> Here is 5th known large prime 19-tuplet:
>
> 2406179998282157386567481191 + d,
> d = 0, 6, 10, 16, 18, 22, 28, 30, 36, 42, 46, 48, 52, 58, 60, 66, 70, 72, 76
> (28 digits, Dec 2012, Raanan Chermoni & Jaroslaw Wroblewski)
>
> This sets new records for 18 and 19 Simultaneous Primes.

Congratulations!
http://users.cybercity.dk/~dsl522332/math/simultprime.htm is updated.

--
Jens Kruse Andersen
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.