Browse Groups

• ## Re: [PrimeNumbers] YOU KNOW ITS PROOF

(3)
• NextPrevious
• ...And finally, we don t do other people s homework for them ... ... I have 2 comments. (a) This is not a well-posed question, for example: A= { z:exp(az) is
Message 1 of 3 , Feb 7, 2006
View Source
...And finally, we don't do other people's homework for them ...

mikeoakes2@... wrote: In an email dated Tue, 7 2 2006 11:43:40 am GMT, "THANOOP T" <thanoopt@...> writes:

> let A anb B are vectorspaces over C such that
> A= { z:exp(az) is algebraic)}
> B= { z:exp(bz) is algebraic)}
> such that a/b not in Q (rationals)
>then how to show that
> dim(A intersection B) <=1 or <=2
> if any one know the proof pls sent

(a) This is not a well-posed question, for example:
"A= { z:exp(az) is algebraic)}" is not a meaningful definition of a vector space over the complex numbers, and so on.

(b) Your question has nothing to do with prime numbers, and so should not have been posted to this newsgroup.

-Mike Oakes

Unsubscribe by an email to: primenumbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
The Prime Pages : http://www.primepages.org/

Mathematics education Mathematics and computer science Number theory

---------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

---------------------------------

---------------------------------
Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.