Browse Groups

• I think that such a chain exists. Heuristically there are infinite number of them. For example, numbers p+(0, 2, 12, 14, 30, 32, 42, 44, 72, 74, 78, 80, 108,
May 31, 2001 1 of 4
View Source
I think that such a chain exists. Heuristically there are
infinite number of them.

For example, numbers

p+(0, 2, 12, 14, 30, 32, 42, 44, 72, 74, 78, 80, 108, 110,
120, 122, 150, 152)

may be 18 consecutive primes infinitely many times
(heuristically).

Andrey
---------------------------------------------------
лХТУЩ БОЗМЙКУЛПЗП СЪЩЛБ ОБ нБМШФЕ! дМС ДЕФЕК, РПДТПУФЛПЧ Й ЧЪТПУМЩИ.
уТЕДЙЪЕНОПНПТШЕ. пУФТПЧ ЛТЕУФПОПУГЕЧ. лТХЗПН ВЙТАЪПЧБС, ЙУЛТСЭБСУС
ОБ УПМОГЕ ЧПДБ...
бЗЕОФУФЧП демйху-феттб, ФЕМ (017) 226-56-73, 220-86-71
• I am also confinced that such a chain is possible. It will be extremely rare though. You might want to check out: http://www.ltkz.demon.co.uk/ktuplets.htm A
Jun 1, 2001 1 of 4
View Source
I am also confinced that such a chain is possible. It
will be extremely rare though.

You might want to check out:

http://www.ltkz.demon.co.uk/ktuplets.htm

A site which records record k-tuplet primes which is
not unlike your search for consecutive twins.

For example:

2845372542509911868266807 + 0, 4, 10, 12, 16, 22, 24,
30, 36, 40, 42, 46, 52, 54, 60, 64, 66, 70 (25 digits,
2000, Joerg Waldvogel & Peter Leikauf)

is the record 18-tuplet.

You haven't made it easy for yourself with 9
consecutive twins though;-)

Have you found lesser chains already? Say 3 or 4
consecutive twins?

Bouk.

--- Andrey Kulsha <Andrey_601@...> wrote:
> I think that such a chain exists. Heuristically
> there are
> infinite number of them.
>
> For example, numbers
>
> p+(0, 2, 12, 14, 30, 32, 42, 44, 72, 74, 78, 80,
> 108, 110,
> 120, 122, 150, 152)
>
> may be 18 consecutive primes infinitely many times
> (heuristically).
>
> Andrey
> ---------------------------------------------------
> ����� ����������� ����� �� ������! ��� �����,
> ���������� � ��������.
> ���������������. ������ ������������. ������
> ���������, ����������
> �� ������ ����...
> ��������� ������-�����, ��� (017) 226-56-73,
> 220-86-71
>
> Unsubscribe by an email to:
> The Prime Pages : http://www.primepages.org
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only \$35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
• Hello! ... There are 7 chains of 8 consecutive twins below 10^13, found by Denis DeVries. This is a copy of his message sent on ... From: Denis DeVries
Jun 1, 2001 1 of 4
View Source
Hello!

Bouk de wrote:

>Have you found lesser chains already? Say 3 or 4
>consecutive twins?

There are 7 chains of 8 consecutive twins below 10^13, found
by Denis DeVries. This is a copy of his message sent on
NMBRTHRY list:

----- Original Message -----
From: Denis DeVries <ddevries2@...>
To: <NMBRTHRY@...>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:58 PM
Subject: Twin Prime Groups

> I've completed an exhaustive search of all primes through
10^13 & found
> seven sets of eight consecutive twin primes. There are no
sets of nine
> consecutive twins < 10^13.
>
> the seven "eight clusters" or "Octa-primes" are:
>
> 110 78197 32821 - 33063
> 373 52832 49697 - 49963
> 458 86461 46631 - 46813
> 634 06985 79419 - 79619
> 841 26497 48537 - 48689
> 920 63598 43907 - 44179
> 966 71456 61911 - 62129
>
> I'd be interested in hearing of the first discovery of a
set of nine
> consecutive twins.
>
> Denis DeVries
> dhdevries@...
----------------------

I guess that Jim Morton read this message and then asked our

Best wishes,

Andrey
---------------------------------------------------
лХТУЩ БОЗМЙКУЛПЗП СЪЩЛБ ОБ нБМШФЕ! дМС ДЕФЕК, РПДТПУФЛПЧ Й ЧЪТПУМЩИ.
уТЕДЙЪЕНОПНПТШЕ. пУФТПЧ ЛТЕУФПОПУГЕЧ. лТХЗПН ВЙТАЪПЧБС, ЙУЛТСЭБСУС
ОБ УПМОГЕ ЧПДБ...
бЗЕОФУФЧП демйху-феттб, ФЕМ (017) 226-56-73, 220-86-71
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.