... thanks for trying to make spammers aware of freedomains ... what if thay do, do thay so need to pay ? ... amavisd-new with altermime post if its solves theMessage 1 of 13 , Oct 1, 2012View Sourceachal skrev den 01-10-2012 16:54:
> I want to add a line in body of every email sent from my postfixthanks for trying to make spammers aware of freedomains
> centos 5
> smtp server.
> We want to add "welcome to our company we offer free SMTP services towhat if thay do, do thay so need to pay ?
> who do not spam".
> This is done to prevent spammers from using our mail services.I wantamavisd-new with altermime
> line to be added in body of every HTML and TEXT email.Is there a way
> to do
post if its solves the spamming problem
... adding lines in mail body, may brake i.e dkim signatures etc , be aware of this, use altermime stand alone or with amavis, best way to do this is at mailMessage 1 of 13 , Oct 1, 2012View SourceAm 01.10.2012 17:39, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> *bruhahaha* *effective*adding lines in mail body, may brake i.e dkim signatures etc , be aware
> proven by what?
> Am 01.10.2012 17:37, schrieb intelligent me:
>> I know that but addition of this in email message body can be effective as many providers use this.
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Mark Goodge <mark@... <mailto:mark@...>> wrote:
>> On 01/10/2012 15:54, achal wrote:
>> I want to add a line in body of every email sent from my postfix centos 5
>> smtp server.
>> We want to add "welcome to our company we offer free SMTP services to those
>> who do not spam".
>> This is done to prevent spammers from using our mail services.I want this
>> line to be added in body of every HTML and TEXT email.Is there a way to do
>> If you don't want your servers to be used for spam then don't let your users send spam. If you're providing
>> mail services to third parties then you need to make sure that you have an enforceable AUP which forbids spam,
>> and have an effective mechanism for responding to complaints about spam.
of this, use altermime stand alone or with amavis, best way to do this
is at mail create time/place however
practise by other big mailers is add some lines if using their webmail
client only , cause altermime may fail finding the end in mail body part
and place your line different cause of different mail clients in the wild
problems with crypto mail are also thinkable
however i dont think that lines make sense at all, freemailers
use them as marketing mostly
MfG Robert Schetterer
Thanks to all my problem is solvedMessage 1 of 13 , Oct 1, 2012View SourceThanks to all my problem is solved
--On October 1, 2012 8:37:27 AM -0700 intelligent me ... The fact that many providers use it is not evidence of effectiveness. It s evidence of popularity.Message 1 of 13 , Oct 1, 2012View Source--On October 1, 2012 8:37:27 AM -0700 intelligent me
> I know that but addition of this in email message body can be effectiveThe fact that many providers use it is not evidence of effectiveness. It's
> as many providers use this.
evidence of popularity. I'd wager that no one has even bothered to measure
Paul Schmehl (geek@...)
The Stovebolt Geek
The Net's Oldest and Most Complete
Resource for Antique Chevy and GM Trucks
I have a question for this POSTFIX group dealing with SPAM. We currently have a Postfix - Mailman - SYMANTEC Cloud (VIRUS / SPAM FILTER) configuration. TheMessage 1 of 13 , Oct 1, 2012View SourceI have a question for this POSTFIX group dealing with SPAM. We currently
have a Postfix - Mailman - SYMANTEC Cloud (VIRUS / SPAM FILTER)
The Mailman service works well, as does basic mail for local Postfix
users, plus we have some alias names redirecting to other email
addresses. If mail is posted to a list, alias or to a user, it gets
archived and sent.
However, I am getting some failure notices for deliveries which appear
to be bypassing Mailman, yet using the Mailman-bounces@... address
to be delivered to external users. The reason I am stating that the
email bypasses Mailman is the following:
1) the message is not in the archives
2) the sender is not an authorized subscriber to the list
3) this is a moderated list and the message is not held
Copied below is the response I am getting back from an end user (who is
a valid subscriber in the list). Can someone please advise if, in your
opinion, this is happening in Postfix -- or should I go back to the
Mailman board for help.
22.214.171.124 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 554 5.7.9 Message not accepted for policy reasons.
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
X-StarScan-Version: 126.96.36.199; banners=-,-,-
Received: (qmail 32680 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2012 16:04:43 -0000
Received: from mail.company.com (HELO mail.company.org) (188.8.131.52)
by server-12.tower-85.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 1 Oct 2012 16:04:43
Received: from company-app02-listserv.custcbb.local (localhost
by mail.company.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDEE20923;
Mon, 1 Oct 2012 12:04:43 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: southeastern-michigan-chapter-owner@... *****this
is a valid list name*****
Received: from client-184.108.40.206.speedy.net.pe (unknown
by mail.company.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D129720247;
Mon, 1 Oct 2012 12:04:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from maila-ea.linkedin.com ([220.127.116.11]) by
mx3.eliteukserve.net; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 07:04:39 -0500
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 07:04:39 -0500
***this is the address not in the subscriber list in Mailman****
From: LinkedIn Connections <connections@...>
Subject: You have been sent a file (Filename: Southeastern-77.pdf)
1 Oct 2012 07:04:39 -0500 FILETIME=[8495E195:4B2C03A5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
****this is the spam email text being blocked *****
Sendspace File Delivery Notification:You've got a file called
Southeastern-9271623.pdf, (357.42 KB) waiting to be downloaded at