Failure to properly configure Postfix isn t a bug. Documentation exists for a reason, if a config doesn t work, fix the config. Don t complain because magicMessage 1 of 33 , Jun 2, 2010View SourceFailure to properly configure Postfix isn't a bug. Documentation exists for a reason, if a config doesn't work, fix the config. Don't complain because magic doesn't happen.
I know nothing about debian, and can't speak to any allowanced postfix does or doesn't make on that platform. I run postfix on OS X, and don't expect the OS to provide postfix with everything it needs.
On Jun 2, 2010, at 9:46 PM, Matt Hayes wrote:
> Yes.. I know this has come up quite a bit, but on freenode in #postfix
> this discussion once again erupted when someone mentioned a bug in
> postfix and referencing this:
> Now, I'm not all that bright on how postfix sorts out the hostname, and
> frankly, I don't care, but I don't like people saying its a 'bug' when I
> have no problems following configuration directives.
> Can someone PLEASE explain this in clear terms as to what they are
> complaining about?
... This thread is over I think... -- Viktor.Message 33 of 33 , Jun 4, 2010View SourceOn Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:59:28PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> I think the manual is at best misleading in this statement.This thread is over I think...