... I dont want to be charged a dollar a second/Kilobyte to access the internet via my 3G internet-enabled device (I dont have one anyway) ... i understandMessage 1 of 23 , Feb 2, 2009View Source--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Matthew Wayne Selznick
>I dont want to be charged a dollar a second/Kilobyte to access the
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:05 PM, tom_a_sparks <tom_a_sparks@...> wrote:
> > but I think that a lot of the so-called podcasters started doing
> > videoblogs, but they f*cked up and started using youtube, Not a
> > downloadalbe format like mp4/wmv etc
> The point of any media is to get it into the eyes / ears of the
> audience. If YouTube is the best way to do that (user familiarity,
> access on an increasing number of Internet-enabled devices) then so be
> it. Why download something when you can stream it on your
> Internet-enabled portable device?
internet via my 3G internet-enabled device (I dont have one anyway)
>i understand that view, but the limitions of youtube is what turn me
> Video podcasters aren't fucking up when they use YouTube. They're
> putting their content in the largest distribution stream available.
off youtube see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_YouTube,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_YouTube and also the youtube
corporation is making money of your video submitions
> Now, I think it's smart to be on YouTube *and* offer a downloadableWasn't the idea of podcasting to officer a downloadble file to be
> option, as with my Teen Poetry podcast... but to say podcasters are
> "doing it wrong" by using YouTube is as misguided as any right-wrong
> "rules" when it comes to this medium.
placed on your non-internet-enabled media player?
... Google makes money off of your content in exchange for infinite bandwidth, near-perfect uptime, and infinite storage. Plus, if I tell someone, My video sMessage 1 of 23 , Feb 2, 2009View SourceOn Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:56 PM, tom_a_sparks <tom_a_sparks@...> wrote:
> i understand that view, but the limitions of youtube is what turn meGoogle makes money off of your content in exchange for infinite
> off youtube see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_YouTube,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_YouTube and also the youtube
> corporation is making money of your video submitions
bandwidth, near-perfect uptime, and infinite storage. Plus, if I tell
someone, "My video's on YouTube," they know exactly what I mean.
Can't count on that if I say, "Have you seen my podcast?"
There are plenty of ways smart people make money off their videos.
Also, I believe YouTube offers ad service through AdSense to folks who
upload videos, so you could even earn money directly.
> Wasn't the idea of podcasting to officer a downloadble file to beNo. The idea of podcasting was to deliver files (audio, video, or
> placed on your non-internet-enabled media player?
anything else) via RSS. You still need the Internet to get the
content at some point.
Has anyone noticed that YouTube is starting to offer downloadable video..?
Matthew Wayne Selznick
Author, Podcaster, Social Media Authority
"Reggie vs. Kaiju Storm Chimera Wolf"
Signed and numbered limited edition chapbook
"Brave Men Run -- A Novel of the Sovereign Era"
Paperback, Ebook, iPhone, Kindle, MP3 CD, Free Podcast
... This may be true. But I contend that a smaller number of people prefer audio to video because it is a more intimate medium. I know video can portrayMessage 1 of 23 , Feb 3, 2009View Source
>This may be true. But I contend that a smaller number of people
> (3) Video is a major dialogue media on the web when audio is not.
> Despite a few initiatives such as on ODEO for a time -- it's video
> rather than audio which people prefer to engage a discussion with.
prefer audio to video because it is a more intimate medium. I know
video can portray intimate things. But audio has a special way of
getting directly into your head. I believe it's because audio can be
akin to the human voice, whereas video has all these layers between
you and the content - a screen, a smaller scale, and the distractions
in the room. Furthermore, I appreciate that audio podcasts allow me
to do other things while I'm listening. Garden, exercise, wash
dishes, rock my baby to sleep.
I work in radio rather than television because I felt the intimacy of
audio, and felt alienated by television. If video is inherently
BETTER than audio, then why doesn't PBS make NPR obsolete? I know NPR
is suffering financially, but it's doing way better than PBS.
Audio is definitely a niche in a world dominated by video. But it's a
time-tested niche with real strengths.
That said, having photos or other web features to draw people into the
audio-only content is critical in a world where web pages are the
portals to audio work. Then once people tune in, the audio can do its
My favorite model for audio content is PRX - the public radio
exchange. It requires registration, but if they eliminated that and
enhanced the ability to embed, they'd have something very much like