Good - just wanted to double check we had the same concern TP. -- Tom Parker firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com ... From: karianna03Message 1 of 5 , Nov 11, 2009View Source
Good - just wanted to double check we had the same concern
thpr@... and tppublic@...
--- On Wed, 11/11/09, karianna03 <martijnverburg@...> wrote:
From: karianna03 <martijnverburg@...>
Subject: [pcgen_developers] Re: Output Tokens - Topic for Code Team Meeting Nov 13/14
Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 4:14 AMHi Tom,
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "karianna03"
> <martijnverburg@> wrote:
> > Yeah the circular reference thing is causing us pain at the moment
> > with the passing in of the ExportHandler to some tokens. So it
> > would be good to avoid that sort of behaviour in the future.
> I want to make sure I'm following. Are you referring to re-entrant
> processing (the discussion we had on caching with AbilityToken) or
> code cycles/code tangles (because ExportHandler specifically
> instantiates the tokens in pcgen.io.export)?
The code tangles bother me more, I understand the need for the re-entrant processing.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: