I m no lst monkey, but isn t there a way to exclude classes also? I think you can add something like !CLASS=Wizard, !CLASS=Sorceror to get around your problemMessage 1 of 3 , Jan 31, 2004View SourceI'm no lst monkey, but isn't there a way to exclude classes also? I
think you can add something like !CLASS=Wizard, !CLASS=Sorceror to get
around your problem with the Cleric tag.
Steinar Hauan wrote:
> [sent to pcgen list and not .LST as i suspect an OS bug]
> let's say you have a feat 'Blah' that adds +2 to the spell stat
> of a particular character class (and thus +1 to it's bonus).
> implemented in a .LST file (for cleric/wizard only), i thought the
> syntax would be
>Blah <descriptive stuff> MULT:YES STACK=NO \
> CHOOSE:Cleric|Wizard BONUS:STAT|BASESPELLSTAT:Class=[NAME]|1
> for a single-class character, this works fine. however, let's say
> i have a multiclass cleric-wizard. now picking "Blah (Cleric)"
> gives me a stat bonus both for Cleric & Wizard.
> fine, guess i dont understand the "[NAME]" thing properly yet (*1)
> but i can always implement it as two feats, right?
>Blah (Wizard) BONUS:STAT|BASESPELLSTAT:Class=Wizard|1
>Blah (Cleric) BONUS:STAT|BASESPELLSTAT:Class=Cleric|1
> so I add "Blah (Cleric)" and it produces the desired effect for that
> class. however, it also gives the same effect for Wizard spells.
> further: adding "Blah (Wizard)" in addition to the Cleric one, suddenly
> gives a +2 stat bonus for _both_ classes.
>(*1) in spite of VERY GOOD documentation of tags. go Doc Monkeys! d.s.
> --> is BASESPELLSTAT treated cleanly for PCs with multiple spell types?
> Steinar Hauan, dept of ChemE -- hauan@...
> Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA, USA
>PCGen's release site: http://pcgen.sourceforge.net
>PCGen's alpha build: http://rpg.plambert.net/pcgen
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>To visit your group on the web, go to:
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
PCGen OS Lemur
Open Source Contributor for over 6 years
"In a world without fences, who needs GATES?"
... it s not clear to me where to place the !Class tags in the most compact definition. ... problem is still that the above should work? i.e. if i pick forMessage 1 of 3 , Jan 31, 2004View SourceOn Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Steve Gilroy wrote:
> I'm no lst monkey, but isn't there a way to exclude classes also? Iit's not clear to me where to place the "!Class" tags in the
> think you can add something like !CLASS=Wizard, !CLASS=Sorceror to get
> around your problem with the Cleric tag.
most compact definition.
> >problem is still that the above "should" work?
> >Blah <descriptive stuff> MULT:YES STACK=NO \
> > CHOOSE:Cleric|Wizard BONUS:STAT|BASESPELLSTAT:Class=[NAME]|1
i.e. if i pick for one class, it should NOT give a bonus for the other.
with STACK=NO and "Blah" for both classes, i only get +1 now.
however, pick "Blah" for any one class, still gives a bonus for both.
Steinar Hauan, dept of ChemE -- hauan@...
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA, USA