cosmos3000 sez... Is the design of PCGen so crappy? Or is ist Java? I am not a lemur (ok I am, but not a code lemur), but I d guess it s Java. SomethingMessage 1 of 35 , Jan 1, 2004View Sourcecosmos3000 sez...
'Is the design of PCGen so crappy? Or is ist Java?'
I am not a lemur (ok I am, but not a code lemur), but I'd guess it's Java.
Something about compiling on the fly just doesn't jive with speed. Or at least
that's how it was explained to me.
Which is why I would push for a less Java-centric PCGen (screw Macs!), but
it'd be a lot of work and I'm lazy.
I mean, if I can't even get a discount out of someone else's misfortune,
what's the point?
-MisterTambo, founding member of the League of Unemployed Gentlemen
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
A little on user friendlyness here. Would it be possible to make Name the default for Sort Equipment on the Equipping? (Instead of Type) I think it is theMessage 35 of 35 , Jan 1, 2004View SourceA little on user friendlyness here.
Would it be possible to make Name the default for "Sort Equipment" on
the Equipping? (Instead of Type)
I think it is the view that makes the most sense for this tab, it
gives you the best overview of the stuff you have already purchased
under the Gear tab.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "merton_monk" <merton_monk@y...> wrote:
> --- In email@example.com, "Jayme Cox" <jayme@r...> wrote:
> > >
> > > IMO, this could be done simply just as Jayme says
> > > without changing the nature of Equipment objects at all.
> > Ross is correct, it wasn't hard to do after all. Code CVS'ed for
> next autobuild.
> Cool - so people can grab the alpha and have a look to see if they
> have any feedback. Thanks for the fast work, Jayme! :)
> > --Jayme