I don't know if you are just ignoring the work we did for U.S. Coast Guard Investigations,
and/or some software "filter" is censoring my email to you, so that you never see it.
But, I will try again anyway.
I'm not buying into the 60/40 distribution on which you speculate in your article above.
Here are just a few reasons why:
If Standard Operating Procedures ("SOP") would have assembled U.S. Navy Commanders at the Naval Command Center ASAP after the WTC towers were attacked, a direct hit by an air-to-ground missile ("AGM")
would definitely have taken out many top-level U.S. Navy officers.
Read HOMICIDE INVESTIGATION!
Please ask yourself this one question: how probable was it that the Office of Naval Intelligence ("ONI") was ON TO the conspiracy,
and those Naval Officers had to be taken out for the Neocons to get their war against Iraq?
Remember that line from the movie JFK by Oliver Stone? "Just get me elected; I'll give you your damn war!"
Lyndon Johnson snapped.
I mean, Sibel Edmonds was ON TO it, and ONI have historically run circles around both the FBI and the CIA.
The Feds received numerous advance warnings, did they not?
Now ask yourself another key question: how important was it
to destroy the evidence that $2.3 TRILLION USD had been embezzled from the Pentagon's accounts by the likes of Dov S. Zakheim and his accomplices, and also to destroy the Pentagon accountants who were doing the forensic reconstruction of that crime?
It must be difficult for the average American to appreciate fully that inter-service competition and rivalry have existed inside the Pentagon for decades.
Just ask the Joint Chiefs of Staff! They'll tell you.
It must also be difficult for the average American to appreciate that the Pentagon's automatic fire control system could not have been so easily penetrated -- and fooled into standing down -- unless both the incoming AGM and the incoming A-3 Skywarrior
were both retrofitted with a "friendly" transponder identification beacon.
Clearly, that necessarily implies an "Inside Job" because those transponder codes are highly classified details.
There really is no other reasonable explanation for why Captain Gerald DeConto would have been on the telephone, requesting verbal authorization from Secretary of the Navy Gordon England, to "engage the incoming" -- at the very
moment the AGM's depleted uranium warhead exploded and incinerated Captain DeConto instantly.
He's now interred at Arlington National Cemetery.
If Cheney and his cohorts were watching the "incoming"
in the bowels of the PEOC, you can be absolutely sure that ONI personnel were also watching that "incoming" on their own radar monitors, with their own mil-spec aircraft tracking systems.
The airspace immediately around the Pentagon is easily
the most tightly controlled airspace anywhere in the world.
Now, when I asked Gordo about all the photographed aircraft debris which our investigation has carefully assembled, all he could say was that "it was trucked in" (his exact words).
Then, he totally stopped corresponding with me any further on this point: no further "details" of his allegation were ever forthcoming.
Well, after assisting U.S. Coast Guard Investigations for 7 full YEARS, it is my studied professional conclusion
that certain very limited amounts of debris may have been "trucked in", but it was not debris from an incoming and remotely controlled A-3 Skywarrior -- packed with TNT and jet fuel -- after that former U.S. Navy jet was launched from the
flight deck of the USS George Washington.
The latter U.S. aircraft carrier was anchored off the coast of Long Island that morning: so, the A-3 was not "trucked in" -- it was FLOWN IN using remote control.
Ask the Russians: we have located reports that their surveillance satellite photographed that launch on the morning of 9/11/2001.
I urge you to contemplate the following active investigative hypothesis:
Veterans Today is attempting to shift the attention of their readers to blame the Mossad and Israeli partisans for their obvious complicity in the events of 9/11.
However, in doing so, it is clear to me that
their chosen writers are doing everything possible to avoid and ignore the complicity of U.S. Military personnel in planning and executing the attack on the Pentagon.
The hit on the Pentagon is, therefore, the key to the whole event.
Accordingly, I am quite prepared to argue -- with evidence -- that this hit and its aftermath were intentionally planned and executed as a "self-inflicted wound".
If Pentagon criminal investigators had been serious about
achieving positive identification of the murder weapons that killed over 100+ Pentagon employees, they would NEVER have allowed raw cctv surveillance video data to be altered in such gross and obvious ways.
Fortunately for our investigation, a foreign "purplish" color was applied in such a way that it outlined the A-3's fuselage -- forward of the visible tail section -- almost perfectly.
That purplish color even "bumped up" to obscure
the overhead cockpit canopy.
Consider also Wayne Madsen's report that a fullEl Al 747 departed JFK at 16:11 on 9/11/2001, destination David Ben Gurion International Airport in Tel Aviv.
Madsen also alleges in his report that the departure of that El Al flight not only violated the proper grounding order issued earlier by Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta; that departure was also assisted by U.S. Military personnel
on the ground.
Well, if the hit squad needed a getaway vehicle, how convenient to load all of them at once onto a huge 747 and rush them swiftly to safety -- in Tel Aviv, of all places!
I can hear the heroes' welcomes echoing in unison
and resounding to the very bottom of hell and back up again.
There are further relevant reports that the A-3 in question had been extensively modified by separate teams who converged at different times on an aircraft hangar located
on the premises of Fort-Collins Loveland Municipal Airport, with immediate access to the tarmac and runways.
That A-3 was part of a fleet of same purchased from the Navy by Raytheon Corporation.
Can you say "Flight Termination System" with a straight face?
How about the Boeing E-4B "airborne command center"?
How probable is it that this E-4B was actually recording "snuff films" to be sold promptly after 9/11 to the highest bidders? Just look
closely at the command and control equipment that is installed on that jet!
Of course these people are THAT EVIL: the ensuing war on Iraq killed 1.25 Million Iraqis, the last time I looked at the casualty count.
In conclusion, THE question for this hour now becomes this: when it is this easy to prove Pentagon complicity in 9/11, the motive for Veterans Today to avoid that "hot potato" and refuse to report the mounting evidence of that complicity,
truly calls into question their journalistic integrity -- if there still is such a thing anywhere on this planet.
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer.
We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.