Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) scripsit:
> Would it be feasible to mandate a particular prefix as part of all
> taxonomy IDs, such as "code:"? For example:
Or for that matter just "_". I *never* understood why that was
such a problem.
> I know you (or someone else) mentioned that publishers do not want to
> modify their existing codes, but something like this would be easy for
> both human and machine to syntactically distinguish from the original
> codes ("12345" or "foo"). In that sense the prefix seems conceptually
> no different from other XML syntax that surrounds the original codes and
> must be parsed away to retrieve the original codes.
Where the wombat has walked, John Cowan <cowan@...
it will inevitably walk again. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan