... From: David S. Bratman To: Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 9:58 AM Subject: Re: [mythsoc] LORD OF THEMessage 1 of 2 , Dec 2 7:52 AMView Source
----- Original Message -----
From: David S. Bratman <dbratman@...>
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: [mythsoc] LORD OF THE RINGS WILL LOOK RICH
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Ian McKellen wrote:
> > "When I first walked into [the] Rivendell [set], I gasped," McKellen
> > "It was like being inside a huge, three-dimensional Lee painting; the
> > of thrill that movie theme parks aim for. The largest of the Wellington
> > [New
> > Zealand] studios had grown an autumnal forest glade of large fiberglass
> > trunks and tangled canvas roots; a Japanese-style bridge spanned the
> > electrified waterfall splashing into a pool. ... The elves' headquarters
> > grew out of the vegetation, slim wooden pillars supporting walkways
> > open spaces and shaded arcades. ..."
> I appreciate the encouraging sentiment, BUT ... I feel more worried than
> encouraged by this.
> The richness and delight of Tolkien's world is a fragile, elven one: like
> fairy gold, it turns to dust when it is stolen away, as any number of
> Tolkien-imitation novelists have proven. Nor are good intentions enough,
> as Pat Murphy showed with her artificial homage _There and Back Again_.
> With this context in mind, my concern is that fiberglass trunks, even if
> they're visually indistinguishable from real trees, will give off the
> intangible air of Disneyland, where fiberglass is the natural species,
> and not that of Rivendell, where fiberglass is unknown.
I rather got the same sentiment; I also wondered about the Japanese bridge.
I doubt very much if the elves have any affinities for Japanese culture,
since they cannot have seen it, and figure the set designers are not
creative enough to think in terms beyond the obvious. Japanese bridges are
beautiful, but in Japan or the Rockefeller Gardens in New York, please. Not
in Middle Earth, which would have their own technological developments.
> My fears are increased by McKellen's description of "the sort of thrill
> that movie theme parks aim for." I don't want the sort of thrill that
> movie theme parks aim for. I want the sort of thrill that Tolkien aimed
> for. They are entirely different, and it's a very bad sign when someone
> does not realize that difference.
You have said this so well. I enjoy Disneyland on its own merits, but
certainly think that the idea of fiberglass trees would anger the Ents to no
end! I don't want a mock-up of Bag End built at Disneyland. Let's hope
that the camera captures the magic, rather than the fibereglass. ---djb
> The Mythopoeic Society website http://www.mythsoc.org
firstname.lastname@example.org wrote... ... A couple of comments on this: 1. I looked up the website photos of Bag End that were recommended earlier. I was very muchMessage 1 of 2 , Dec 2 11:36 AMView Sourcedianejoy@... wrote...
>I enjoy Disneyland on its own merits, butA couple of comments on this:
>certainly think that the idea of fiberglass trees would anger the Ents to
>end! I don't want a mock-up of Bag End built at Disneyland. Let's hope
>that the camera captures the magic, rather than the fiberglass.
1. I looked up the website photos of Bag End that were recommended earlier.
I was very much impressed. I agree with Berni that they appeared to be true
2. When I visited the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine sets, when the show was
still being filmed, I was very much surprised to see how papier-mache
everything looked, up close. Obviously fake! But on the screen, it all
appears real and futuristic to me. So I have hope that the fiberglass trees
won't appear artificial on screen, either.
Joan Marie Verba verba001@...
Mythopoeic Press Secretary, Mythopoeic Society
List Administrator for DocEx, Mythsoc,
MNSCBWI, and MNSCREENW lists