Dear list member, On behalf of the Council of Stewards (the governing board of the Mythopoeic Society), I d like to thank you for participating, whetherMessage 1 of 40 , May 10, 2005View SourceDear list member,
On behalf of the Council of Stewards (the governing board of the
Mythopoeic Society), I'd like to thank you for participating, whether
actively or passively, with the Society's email discussion list. The
Society exists for the study, discussion, and enjoyment of fantastic
and mythic literature, especially the works of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S.
Lewis, and Charles Williams. As such, the yahoogroups discussion list
helps us to fulfill that purpose.
Recently, however, events on the list have precipitated a number of
people leaving the list, some publicly and some privately. Almost all
have done so because they have felt that strongly held beliefs were
drowning out the free exchange of ideas on the list.
While the Council of Stewards does not wish to curtail the open
exchange of ideas, we feel that some rules are needed in order to
allow as many to participate as possible. As such, we are implementing
the following rules:
1. All members will henceforth be limited to only five (5) posts per
24-hour period. Any member who fails to follow this rule will be
placed on moderated status.
2. Any member whose postings are determined by either the Council of
Stewards or by the list moderator to be unduly ad hominem in character
or whose postings routinely display a disregard for the views of
others will be put on moderated status.
3. Any member on moderated status who continues to violate the above
rules will be banned from the list.
The Council of Stewards hereby wishes to recognize the good job that
Joan Marie Verba has been doing in moderating this list, which was
established as a very loosely moderated list. However, as the stewards of
the interests of the Society, we feel that some action is needed lest
we lose sight of those very principles which make the Mythopoeic
Society so unique in fantasy literature societies today, namely that
we are open to all scholars, writers, and readers of these
We ask that you all join with us to help the Society continue not only
to be open to diverse constituencies, but also to do so in a way that
is polite and considerate.
President, Mythopoeic Society
On behalf of the Council of Stewards
Hi Bill how s the coffee? Mine s not so great lately. Yes, I would like to see more about other authors. I do love Tolkien, honestly the man was a genius,Message 40 of 40 , May 11, 2005View SourceHi Bill how's the coffee? Mine's not so great lately.
Yes, I would like to see more about other authors. I do love Tolkien,
honestly the man was a genius, but I want to hear more about today too.
And I especially want to know who else reads Kazantzakis, or knows people
who do. I am behind in my reading, but he's one of my favorites, and I'd
really like some insights.
Do you know that there are rats with curly coats? I have never seen one.
Do you think they would have better insulation when they had to swim away
from the ship?
Elizabeth Apgar Triano
amor vincit omnia
> [Original Message]about
> From: Bill West <lunacy2@...>
> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: 5/11/2005 2:31:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [mythsoc] From the Council of Stewards
> In the interest of full disclosure, let me say upfront that I am
> co-moderator of the
> other list with Lizzie.
> This might be rambling. I slept in late and my first cup of coffee
> hasn't quite
> taken hold as yet. Apologies in advance.
> While I am not one of the listmembers who has written Joan privately
> the list, I have expressed similiar opinions in posts here. I wasn'ttheir
> how many others might feel the same way until folks began joining the
> List. There's a lot of people on this list who never post and while I'm
> sure there's
> many who are see no problem, I'm equally sure there are others who do
> prefer not to voice it and deal with the fall out after.
> For example, those who've written Joan offlist have been labeled
> It makes them sound like sailors downbelow decks plotting mutiny.
> Why should anyone who raises a legitmate concern about the tone and
> of the list be stuck with such a label?
> It points to the reason why they took it in private to Joan.
> I think I've been on this list three or four years now, and for the
> most part,
> it's usually the same group of about a dozen folks involved in the
> I know from being on other lists that not everyone on a mail list
> but I would have thought I'd see some others out of 310 members
> over a three or four year span. A good portion of them most likely simply
> agree with the opinions the others expressed and see no reason to add
> And others..and I readily concede they may be few...might not agree but
> don't speak because they've seen how some others who've advanced an
> idea contrary to the active group are sometimes treated.
> The other list was started after the last go round over Lewis
> because it became
> exactly that..a go-round..with the tone becoming..umm..shall we
> say...acidic? Liz
> and I emailed back and forth about it and then started the Disaffected
> list as a place
> where some of the issues raised here could be continued a bit more
> civily and other
> authors outside of the Inklings could be discussed. We hope people will
> feel able to
> raise any issue for spirited debate without fear of unkind commentary.
> Now..all that being said..
> I must disagree respectfully with the proposed Rule change. I'm a
> I deal in ideas. Limiting how many posts a person can make a day (except
> cases of abuse, such as flooding or spamming) seems a form of censorship.I
> think that Joan has done a great job and I trust her to continue to do so
> without the imposing of any barriers to the flow of ideas.
> I know I have more to say but that first cup of coffee has come and
> and I think I'm going to go make another.