Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Sebastian Breier wrote:
> [ .. ]
>>Just had another thought... maybe you should indeed recompile
>>mod_perl-2 with the older CVS sources, so I can try it out on
>>Apache 2.0.45, and we can be 100% sure that this is the
>>Maybe the problem really is that the old binaries aren't
>>compatible with the new Apache, but at the moment we just don't
>>know. Trying it out would help.
> Stas heroically managed to track down the problem with the
> current cvs sources on Win32; the mod_perl ppm package at
> http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ now is compiled against these
> sources, with Apache 2.0.45.
Nothing spectacular here, just a routine remote surgery ;)
Serously, I've just hidden the cause of the problem, which will be resurfaced
and resolved in the post-1.99_09 release.
Please test the current cvs on all platforms and all perl/apache
configurations you can and report any problems asap. We want to get 1.99_09
out of the door asap. I'll post a release candidate soonish, but the current
cvs is a good one to work with. You can get a snapshot/cvs here:
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@... http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com