Sounds very good.. there already is an issue #25 though!Message 1 of 3 , Jul 12, 2009View SourceSounds very good.. there already is an issue #25 though!
Quoting thomasicom <ticomiirg@...>:
> Via: http://ticom.livejournal.com/170845.html
> The time has come, the editor said, to talk of many things,
> Of scanning, surveillance, telemetry,
> Of fanciful hacking flings,
> Does big brother have all the toys?
> Or can we clip his wings?
> Topic: Scanning/Surveillance/Telemetry
> Submission Deadline: September 1st, 2009
> Email: cybertechzine@...
> Acceptable Formats: Microsoft Word, Open Office, Rich Text, ASCII.
> Pictures in
> bitmap or jpeg.
> Articles should be illustrated or have accompanying photographs, and be in a
> DIY-type format, although we do occasionally accept a well-written
> op-ed piece.
> The reader should be able to take the information in the article and do
> something after they finish reading. Difficulty level can be from beginner to
> advanced. We like to have something for everyone. Material should be
> unpublished, and by submitting an article you grant Cybertech Zine
> first release
> Prospective contributors can peruse the back issues collection
> available at the
> following web site:
> http://gbppr.dyndns.org/2600/TAP/cybertek/index.html to get
> a feel for the zine, and then feel free to go off and do their own thing.
> Accepted authors will receive a free hardcopy edition of Issue #25, the
> gratitude of the technological underground community, and an
> additional entry in
> their DHS file.
> Yahoo! Groups Links
You re absolutely right, and I feel like a complete and total dumbass for making that mistake. Replace all instances of 25 with 26 . Deadline is still theMessage 1 of 3 , Jul 13, 2009View SourceYou're absolutely right, and I feel like a complete and total dumbass for making that mistake.
Replace all instances of "25" with "26".
Deadline is still the same. Topic is still the same. Email is still cybertechzine(at)gmail(dot)com.
-Your slightly addled Cybertech Zine editor.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, multiplx@... wrote:
> Sounds very good.. there already is an issue #25 though!