... From: ARRL Web site To: Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 8:07 AM Subject: WEAVER S WORDS - JULY 4TH EDITION
Message 1 of 1
, Jul 1, 2005
----- Original Message -----
From: "ARRL Web site" <memberlist@...>
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 8:07 AM
Subject: WEAVER'S WORDS - JULY 4TH EDITION
> [SEND COMMENTS OR INQUIRIES TO: k8je@..., only.]
> See below for:
> 1. Field Day.
> 2. H. Res. 230.
> 3. Leaders appointed or ARRL Grassroots Lobbying Program in GLD.
> 4. Thoughts on bandwidth limits.
> FIELDD Day
> Tnx in large part to a cantankerous left foot and leg, I wasn't able
> to get out to visit any of the FD sites in my area. I did the next
> best thing: operated on the air from my home QTH as much as I could.
> Even this wasn't glorious success because of time limitations. The
> bottom line is that I made just over 75 Qs which I limited to stations
> in Kentucky, Michigan and Ohio. I wanted to give as many points as I
> could to folks in "my" territory.
> My practice is to send QSLs for essentially each Q I make. Half of the
> QSLs for FD are in the mail and the rest will be there within a couple
> of days. I always enjoy receiving cards for QSOs, but if any of you do
> not readily have QSLs readily available, don't worry about sending a
> card to me. If you have them, though, I'd sure like to add them to my
> collection of members from this Division.
> US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES RESOLUTION 230
> In my previous E-mail newsletter I asked you each to send a letter
> (that I provided) to ask your US Representative to co-sponsor H.R. 230
> (note this is not a House Bill). This Resolution would "ask" the FCC
> to review the details of its decision to allow Broadband over Power
> Lines essentially without insuring it would not wipe out operations on
> our HF and VHF bands.
> There good news is that some 250 of you care enough about protecting
> our frequencies that you took the time to send the letter. The bad
> news is that this is only 250 of the more than 12,000 members in this
> Division. Could it be that the 11,750 who did not take the time to
> write just don't give a tinker's dam about Amateur Radio? I certainly
> hope this is not the case.
> In case you care about the future of Amateur Radio and your lack of
> writing is because you didn't read my last newsletter or it got lost in
> the E-mail or you simply forgot about it, there is still time for you
> to write. If you still have my May 29/30 WEAVER'S WORDS, the letter
> and instructions for sending it are in this issue.
> If you no longer have the May 29/30 issue, let me know and I'll send
> the information to you right away.
> Please take the time to help defend Amateur Radio. Become an active
> participant in defending our frequencies.
> Of course, thanks very to you members of the "LEADING 250" for your
> support of Amateur Radio. I don't have the time at this moment to
> thank you individually as is my usual practice, but be assured your
> help is very much appreciated.
> GRASSROOTS LOBBYING PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT IN THE GLD
> You've doubtlessly seen several of my writings on the still-new, ARRL
> Grassroots Lobbying effort during previous months. This program very
> frankly has the greatest potential of anything I know to promote the
> future of Amateur Radio. The letter writing referred to above and
> during the past year or so is just part of the non-partisan lobby
> project we are developing. The next step in this project is to develop
> a working structure for it.
> Therefore, it is my great pleasure to announce the appointment of the
> following Great Lakes Division ARRL members to leadership positions in
> the Grassroots program:
> 1. VICE DIRECTOR DICK MONDRO, W8FQT, is appointed DIVISION LEGISLATIVE
> ACTION CHAIRMAN (LAC), GREAT LAKES DIVISION. He reports to Director
> Jim Weaver, K8JE. Dick is responsible for guiding development and
> activities of the Grassroots program in the three states in this
> 2. JIM ASHMAN, W8ASH, is appointed STATE LEGISLATIVE ACTION COORDINATOR
> (SLAC), OHIO. Jim reports to Division Legislative Action Chairman
> Mondro and is responsible for guiding development and activities of the
> Grassroots program in the State of Ohio.
> 3. VAL ROSE, N8EXV, is appointed STATE LEGISLATIVE ACTION COORDINATOR
> (SLAC), MICHIGEAN. Val reports to Division Legislative Action Chairman
> Mondro and is responsible for guiding development and activities of the
> Grassroots program in the State of Michigan.
> The legislative activity referred to in the above paragraphs is Federal
> government in nature. Legislative action originating in the state
> governments in our three Sections is under the management of the
> Section Manager through the Section Government Liaisons (SGL) they
> I had hoped to be able to announce appointment of a Kentucky State
> Legal Action Coordinator. Chairman Mondro is discussing this
> appointment with appropriate individuals at this time.
> I thank Jim, Val and Dick for accepting their very important
> SHOULD BANDWIDTH OF TRANSMITTED SIGNALS BE REGULATED?
> In one form or another, this question has been raised by many amateurs.
> Most of these are intelligent, highly-motivated hams. A recent
> question by one of these hams (an ARRL member in the GLD) essentially
> suggested as have other that it would be best if we just opened the
> bands. After I read reply which attempted to add perspective to his
> discussion, I thought I'd share this with each of you who red this
> newsletter. Here it is:
> "I certainly hear you . . . on the point about seeming inconsistencies
> in the current state of the draft bandwidth proposal. Being a
> simplistic purist myself, these also disturb me. Conversely, where
> should we draw the "line" and, more importantly, should the "line" be
> "In sharp contrast to my uneasiness over setting upper bandwidth limits
> are my equal concerns over the downsides of having no such limits. In
> contrast with current thinking of establishing upper (transmitted
> signal) bandwidth limits, is the proposal by many hams to have
> absolutely no limits -- i.e., to have wide open bands. This proposal
> to the opposite extreme of regulating transmitted signals has merit of
> its own. There would be no limitation to experimentation and use
> provided the signal was "kept within the band." Of course, depending
> upon the band and propagation, this extreme would prevent anyone else
> from using the band during times the full-band signal was being
> "My quandary is that what one person considers "the way to go" is
> nearly the opposite to the thinking of another person. Automatic
> digital covering all bands is the ideal of some folks. Absolutely no
> automatic digital is the ideal of others. Enhanced SSB, fully Hi-FI
> (and stereo) AM, wideband FM, etc. are the "things" that turn on a
> number of people. At least some of these folks would like these modes
> to have access to all ham frequencies.
> "OK, so what does all this mean to me at this moment? It means that
> compromises must be made by all of us for the good of all of us. This
> is the way life is in so many of its features. The question that
> derives from this fact of life simply is, "where are the best places to
> make compromises so we can ensure the best overall health and viable
> future of Amateur Radio . . . and simultaneously allow each individual
> amateur to obtain the greatest possible joy from our great service?"
> "In all seriousness, I ask just what your answers are to this last
> "Tnx for your interest in as well as your fine dedication to Amateur
> Radio. I truly appreciate hearing your thoughts and look forward to
> your further ideas.
> THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IS KNOWING WHICH PART(S) OF IT SHOULD BE GIVEN UP
> TO ENSURE FREEDOM OF OTHERS, AND WHEN THIS SHOULD BE DONE.
> I wish each of you 73 & GL,
> Jim Weaver, K8JE
> Director, Great Lakes Division ARRL; http://www.arrl.org/
> 5065 Bethany Rd., Mason, OH 45040
> Tel.: 513-459-0142; E-mail: k8je@...
> ARRL: The reason Amateur Radio Is!
> MEMBERS: The reason ARRL Is!
> ARRL Great Lakes Division
> Director: James Weaver, K8JE
> This message is being sent to you via the ARRL Members Only Web site.
> If you do not want to receive further messages, go to the site at:
> Log in with your username and password and change your email options.
> Unchecking the "News and information from your Division Director and
> Section Manager" box will prevent messages such as this one from
> being sent to you.
> -- webmaster@...
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer.
We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.