June 9, 2003
Who Is Judging
Linda Kennedy, (WBFLegal@...) a Virginia JAILer attorney
whose law license is being called into question, argued her case before the Supreme Court
of Virginia this past Wednesday, June 4, 2003.
Her argument below is
recounted by Texas JAILer Ed Truncellito, who himself faced a similar
disbarment proceeding for his law license within Texas for speaking out for
Evidence is mounting that
every Attorney Bar and Judicial Commission is really about weeding out
ethical members among themselves who cling to honestly and integrity, and is not
about discipline corruption with their own ranks.
As a result of the
insurmountable corruption within our justice system, many attorneys are
becoming fed up, and are now challenging the very system of which they
belonged to based upon honesty and integrity. Thus, honest
attorneys and judges are now facing disbarment and/or removal
from the bench like never before. The message being sent is, "No honest man
need apply to the legal profession!"
It is for this very
reason that the judicial accountability, as presented by J.A.I.L., is bound, in
due time, to come about as sure as a starving nation will revolt for food.
J.A.I.L. is as a candle light within a cave. The darker the cave, the brighter
the candle appears. All the darkness in the world cannot dispel light, but
light, no matter how small, dispels all darkness.
Whistleblower Puts Virginia Supreme Court on Trial June
Yesterday seven Justices
of the Virginia Supreme Court were put on
trial in their own
court by attorney Linda Kennedy, who was disbarred last year. The Justices
had the spotlight turned around on them when Kennedy addressed them from the
podium. Kennedy was there to appeal her Disbarment for violating the First
Unwritten Rule of Virginia Legal Ethics: do not embarrass the Virginia Bar by
blowing the whistle on white-collar crimes they commit against
an unwitting Virginia public.
Kennedy began by
throwing Chief Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell, Sr., off guard. She
complimented him saying she heard him preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ at
Regent University. Maybe he momentarily forgot that a similar tactic
was used by the Apostle Paul to subdue King Agrippa.
straightened up and beamed with pride as he was reminded of the
distinction that Regent bestowed upon him in the eyes of his black
community by honoring him as a professor of law and
Next Kennedy quoted
a second one of the Justices, a woman, who was published as stating
that legal process must always be above suspicion. Kennedy thanked her for
the statement, but added that the message apparently has not yet reached the
Kennedy silenced a
third Justice by interrupting his question and asking that the Justices not ask
her any more questions. She said they had a copy of her written brief, and
she wanted to use her entire 15 minutes to explain to them in person how
their legal system has become disgracefully corrupt. And if that did not
convince them, then nothing ever would.
moment later a fourth Justice, another woman, interrupted to ask if she
understood correctly that Kennedy did not want to answer their questions,
perhaps implying that Kennedy had something to hide. But Kennedy rebuked her.
Kennedy said it could not have been made any plainer: "no questions." The
Justice pushed herself back in her chair showing consternation, but she had
nothing more to say.
Having silenced the
Justices, Kennedy then proceeded - shall we say "earnestly" -
to "chew their butts," as plain folk in Virginia would call it. Good for you,
Kennedy, because the buck stops here. These Justices are the senior officers of
the Virginia Bar whose lawyers are trying to cover up the fact that Kennedy
caught them red-handed falsifying the very court record that these Justices had
sitting right there under their noses on the bench. The legal process that
brought them the case record was not merely suspicious - it was blatantly
Kennedy had fished
through the trial court's trash cans and found the trial court's handwritten
notes that the trial judge had approved falsifications of the trial record to
cover up perjury by the lawyer who heads the Virginia Bar's Ethics
Kennedy has audio
tapes that prove what the Ethics leader really said, in his own recorded voice.
But the trial court cut out the part of the record where the trial judge refused
to allow those audio tapes to be played. Ironically, the trial judge's comments
were falsified in the record claiming he said he would have exonerated Kennedy
if only she could have proved what the audio tapes in fact do
Talk about smoking
guns. But this is just one of the more glaring cases. It is an open secret that
records are being falsified routinely in cases all over the state and all over
the country while the high courts hear it with a deaf ear. Zed McLarnon, a
forensic audio-visual expert, has documented that transcripts in Massachusetts
courts are altered with the knowledge of court personnel. In Indiana, Rebecca
Rohrs has conclusively documented literally thousands of alterations in hearing
transcripts in a child custody case. "This is criminal misconduct," attorney
Eugene Wrona says of similar practices in Pennsylvania, "and these people belong
Further, it is
notorious that lawyer whistleblowers can all expect to share Kennedy's fate. Law
students are misled like the public, being told in law school that law is an
honorable profession. Not until they begin practicing do they discover how money
really changes hands. Only after they have invested years in their law school
education are they taught that they must maintain an unwritten code of secrecy.
Then they shut up - or they are disbarred.
After Kennedy's 15
minutes, Chief Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell, Sr. told her the time was
up. Kennedy announced that there was no need for her to listen to her opponent's
excuses or comment on them. Then she walked out with some of the 30
supporters who accompanied her, including pastors and
The Justices in
this case will pronounce a verdict on themselves. If they order a full
investigation and a new trial of her disbarment, then the Justices will have
pronounced their innocence. Otherwise, Regent ought to reconsider whom they
allow to preach to our youth.
J.A.I.L. is an acronym for Judicial
Accountability Initiative Law
JAIL's very informative website is found at www.jail4judges.org
JAIL proposes a
unique new addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is
dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
JAIL is spreading across America like a
fast moving wildfire!
JAIL is making inroads into Congress for federal
JAIL may be supported at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA
To subscribe or be removed: AddRemove@...
E-Groups sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Open forum to make your voice heard JAIL-SoundOff@egroups.com
what J.A.I.L. can do for me, but ask what I can do for J.A.I.L.
"..it does not require a majority to prevail,
but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's
minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of
evil to one who is
striking at the
-- Henry David Thoreau <><