J.A.I.L. News Journal
Los Angeles - September
Listen to HotSeat4Judges daily on
Internet Radio M-Th, 6-7 pm
Get a J.A.I.L. For Judges T-Shirt for your next court
Write baronboy@... and
place your order today!
I have stated on occasion how
the Second Amendment defenders have shunned the cause of J.A.I.L. I have
expressed how their mission may be accomplished placing attention upon defending
the entire Constitution through JAIL, and not just the Second
One gun organization stated that
they could not support JAIL because the Second Amendment was not
expressly set forth in JAIL. I asked myself, what is it they
want? JAIL specifies "any deliberate violation of the Constitutions of
[state name] or of the United States. It would appear they want JAIL
to add, "including the Second Amendment," as though the Second Amendment
were something detached from the United States Constitution. I somehow
sense a position of uncertainty in their stand.
I asked a room full of defenders of
the Second Amendment if they thought that all these anti-gun legislation
laws were unconstitutional, and everyone in the room raised their hands. I then
followed up with the challenge, "Then why don't you just go into court and have
these laws declared unconstitutional by a judge?" They responded that they had
already taken this issue into the courts. Then I responded, "Why, then, are
we still here arguing that we have rights under the Second Amendment? How
come we haven't already laid this issue to rest?" I was attempting to
invoke out of their own mouths that the problem was "the
I further challenged them with the
words, "Why fight with your enemies when you can get them to support you." Even
the left professes to believe that everyone must obey the law. That's
what we want in JAIL, the law obeyed. Even liberals support JAIL. Further, the
liberal politicians swear with an oath to uphold, without reservation, the
State and Federal Constitutions. By supporting JAIL, you support the
Constitution, all the Constitution, including the First, Second, Third and
Fourth Amendments of the Constitution.
Somehow, these Second Amendment
defenders want to get legislators into Congress to write good gun law
like, "The right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Do
they really think a good gun law like that will be of higher significance than
what is already written in the Constitution? Or is it they think that the Second
Amendment is confusing and needs to be rewritten? Oh, no, they wouldn't admit to
that. So it's back to the position that good gun laws will somehow become more
effective than the good Second Amendment we now already have.
Is it not likely that the same
judges do not respect the Second Amendment whatsoever will never respect a
law that says the same thing? So what law is it they want written? What is their
real motive? It is a fact, that time and time again I cannot get anywhere with
the Second Amendment people. They seem to have ears that cannot hear, and eyes
that cannot see, but a mouth that talks a good talk, but, as I say, is it
really a good talk? It appears they are their own worse enemy. I am persuaded
that the Second Amendment people will never get anywhere because of the Second
They will go on arguing they have
rights under the Second Amendment, but will refuse to see that the root of
their problem is the judiciary, not the legislature or bad gun laws. As I say,
"What's wrong with the Second Amendment?" They can not answer that
I've had any number of people who,
when I have previously written on this topic say, "Amen" "Your right on
point." I figure that by hammering on this point, I can force the gun people to
come clean and blast away at JAIL and argue exactly why they cannot support it.
It seems to me that they just rather go to sleep and not have to think about
what I am saying. They never argue with me. (Is anyone
I well realize in writing this article that I
may never be invited to speak at another gun rights seminar or convention. I
accept that cost.
What inspired me to write this
article is the position expressed by Mr. John Wolfgram below. I provide his
account to you for his argument of "the rest of the story." I'll let
it speak for itself.
The thing that I noted that
makes 2nd Amendment and NRA supporters not Jail supporters, is the big
money orientation. NRA depends on lobbyists and has to support a lobby
industry to influence Congressmen to support good gun laws.
That brings in money
and is the reason it needs that money forever, to support a lobby industry to
lobby for good laws. That industry is their spokesmen and that industry and
its advisors do not want to hear anything that is inconsistent with their
business of influencing Congressmen to be good Congressmen to get the support of
Jail is inconsistent with
that basic position. Jail teaches that the judiciary and
Judicial Immunity is the evil. The way to fix it is to simply remove
the insulating effects of immunity. It's a one shot deal and it does
not require or employ lobbyists.
Business speaking, Jail and
NRA have nothing in common. Jail, if right, will put NRA lobbyists out
J.A.I.L. is an acronym for (Judicial
Accountability Initiative Law)
JAIL's very informative website is found at www.jail4judges.org
JAIL proposes a
unique new addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is
dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
JAIL's is spreading across America like
a fast moving wildfire!
JAIL is making inroads into Congress for federal
JAIL may be supported at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA
To subscribe or be removed: add-remove-jail@...
To send published judicial articles: USA-jail4judges@...
contact the author of JAIL4Judges: jail4judges@...
E-Groups are encouraged to sign on at firstname.lastname@example.org
"..it does not require a majority to prevail,
but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's
minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of
evil to one who is
striking at the
-- Henry David Thoreau