Clarifying Presentments to
By Ron Branson
Dear David Phillips:
March 28, 2013
You have stated to me "We
need to research and clarify the procedure for a Special Grand
Jury." Your concern will provide a wonderful
and educational subject for discussion
for everyone, hence, I am distributing for all to be a part.
I trust that by now you have
received my dissertation on this
matter which I sent to Thomas
Bumgardner. Therein, I discussed that our Founding Fathers, having
seen the need for the People to be the last and final word in
control of their government, surely did not mean to preclude the
People from access to their own Grand Juries in making
Presentments. Such preclusion would leave the government uniquely
in the position of bring the only one who could bring its own
conduct before Grand Juries.
In opposing such argument, I would like to appeal to pure logic.
In Declaration of Independence our Founding Fathers set forth that
all governments derive their just powers from the consent of the
governed. It would be an absolute senseless contradiction to
reason that our Founding Fathers meant to preclude us, the People,
from the Grand Jury process, and preserve that right exclusively
to governments policing themselves. This would lead to an
inevitable revolt by the People, and certain anarchy when the
People decided that they had had enough crime and politicking by
their government. Are we not nearing that stage now, which proves
my point? Access to Grand Juries by the People is an absolute
necessity if we are going to preserve the future of our country!
Yes, you are correct, this issue of presentments needs to be
clarified to make it clear that the People have access to Grand
Juries. This clarification is precisely what I was very careful to
include within the creation of the J.A.I.L. Special Grand Jury
system. J.A.I.L. does not tamper with the Fifth Amendment as
written, but leaves it totally intact. Rather it creates a SPECIAL
Grand Jury specifically reserved as a Sword in the hands of the
People to fill this needed clarification.
The government does perceives what J.A.I.L. (Judicial
Accountability Initiative Law) will do on this issue, and that is
precisely why it scares the [explicitive deleted] out of them.
Read how our State Attorney General, Bill Lockyer in California,
said about J.A.I.L. when he defined what this Initiative would do
if passed in California; "JUDGES.
RESTRICTIONS ON JUDICIAL IMMUNITY. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL
existing judicial immunity and creates three 25-member
'Special Grand Juries' empowered to: determine if a judge may
invoke judicial immunity in a civil suit; indict and, through
a special trial jury, convict and sentence a judge for
criminal conduct; and permanently remove a judge who receives
three adverse immunity decisions or three criminal
convictions. Disallows immunity for deliberate violations of
law, fraud, conspiracy, intentional due process violations,
deliberate disregard of material facts, judicial acts outside
the court's jurisdiction, unreasonable delay of a case, or any
deliberate constitutional violation."
Thus, through this J.A.I.L. Initiative, as explained by the
Attorney General, the People can then reach government officials
by making them the subject of civil lawsuits, and naming their
criminal conduct. We fully anticipate that the judges will cover
for these criminal charges against government officials. So then,
we the People, just exhaust all judicial remedies within the
State, thus making these judges also culpable in the government's
crimes as fellow conspirators. Thus, we gain access now to the
Special Grand Jury without any participation or interference of
District Attorneys or State Attorney Generals. It will be just us
in the process, and we, the People, have regained total control
over our government, as the way our Founding Fathers intended it
Thank you for being sharp in recognizing this necessity for this
clarification in Grand Jury Presentments.
-------- Original Message --------
We need to research and clarify the procedure
for a Special Grand Jury to make a PRESENTMENT.
Many people are aware of this possibility, but
not the actual procedure.
I think if we could come up with the proper
procedure (and it may vary slightly from place to place),
it would be a great help.
But, you are on the right track.
By Ron Branson
This past Saturday, March 23rd, 2013, I was invited to
speak at the Simi Valley Library, (California) in
which I presented the issue that Grand Juries are the
highest and most supreme power within these United
States. No serious criminal action of any kind, may be
commenced against any person without their authority,
to wit; "No person shall be held to answer for a
capital, or other infamous crime, unless on a
presentment or indictment of a
Grand Jury ..." Amendment V, U.S. Constitution.
Furthermore, the People within the various States have
a superior power compared to the limited federal power
of government as defined in the 9th and 10th
Within the States, the People themselves have, and
retain to themselves all political power, and have the
right to alter or amend all forms of government, to
wit; "All political power is inherent in the People.
.... [T]hey have the right to alter or reform it when
the public good may require." Art. II, Sec. 1,
California Constitution. (See also other various
So, if all political power resides within the People,
and the People, sitting as Grand Jurors, have the
ultimate control over all criminal matters and are
free to indict whomsoever they will, including public
officials, why propose Recalls of public officials?
Are we not thereby relinquishing our ultimate power of
indictment through ourselves as Grand Jurors, to a
lessor more impotent means of seeking a remedy through
playing in a political sand box?
I have presented the one and only way we will ever
recover our country, and that is through our inherent
power to establish Special Grand Juries throughout the
various States. But yet we choose to ignore this
ultimate power reserved only to us, and seek expensive
inferior time-consuming political remedies.
National JAIL4Judges Commander-In-Chief