J.A.I.L. News Journal ______________________________________________________ Los Angeles, California April 25, 2007Message 1 of 1 , Apr 25, 2007View SourceJ.A.I.L. News Journal
Los Angeles, California April 25, 2007______________________________________________________The Battle Lines are Drawn: J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign PowerA Power Foreign to Our Constitution
J.A.I.L. or Anarchy?It's Up to The PeopleBy Barbie, ACIC National J.A.I.L.J.A.I.L. is an offer, not a mandate.Despite the fact that Mr. Branson sees J.A.I.L. as God's answer for the People in these days of despotism, he publicly states that J.A.I.L. is but only God's offer to the People of this country, not a mandate. Whether or not J.A.I.L. is received and put into practice is entirely up to the People. J.A.I.L. is designed as the "consent of the People" to hold the judiciary, and hence all of government, accountable to them under strict constitutional standards specifying seven procedural violations in particular, to wit: (1) any deliberate violation of law; (2) fraud or conspiracy; (3) intentional violation of due process of law; (4) deliberate disregard of material allegations; (5) judicial acts without jurisdiction; (6) blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case; and (7) any deliberate violation of the Constitutions of the state or the United States. See ¶2 of the J.A.I.L. Amendment.J.A.I.L. relies on the fact that government is instituted by the People to protect their property consisting of their God-given inherent, inborn rights; and that it derives its just powers from the consent of the People, as confirmed in our Founding Document, the Declaration of Independence. J.A.I.L. is based on the premise that each of the above seven specified violations by judges, as defined in the Amendment, violates --fails to protect-- the People's inherent rights, hence, is destructive of the role of government which fails to exercise its just powers as consented by the People. J.A.I.L. stands for the principle that a violation of just one individual's rights is a violation of the rights of the People generally, of society as a whole; that the rights even of People who have never sought redress of grievances are nevertheless violated daily in our courts across this belovedcountry. Therefore, J.A.I.L. is offered to the People as a means by which they may renew their consent to effect the proper role of government and diminish further violation of their rights. It's left purely to the People to accept or reject this offer.That choice rests upon the People's right to vote.The People's vote determines our survival as an ordered society. Without it, society will degenerate into anarchy. That's why the question: "J.A.I.L., or Anarchy?" The answer to that question depends on the People preserving their right to vote.The vote is the "voice of the People" especially regarding their government-- it's the means of giving its consent to government. When the Declaration says it is the duty of the People to throw off such government, meaning the power in control by abuses and usurpation and reducing the People under absolute despotism (in other words, a counterfeit government), isn't that done by the voting process? The state Constitutions of the initiative states acknowledge that the People have the right to alter or amend their forms of government as they deem necessary. Isn't that done by the initiative, passed by the voting process?The People (the governed) giving its consent to government is a right-- that's the way government is supposed to operate, by consent of the governed. That has to be done by their vote. Rights are not created by constitutions. They exist despite constitutions, even without constitutions. I see the right to vote as a natural inherent right of the People, as a necessary means to express their consent for government. That's how J.A.I.L. will become a reality, by the People amending their state Constitution in a manner they deem necessary by voting for it, state by state. The right to vote necessarily includes the right to vote intelligently-- the right to be informed of the issues to be voted on without interference by any power or influence. The right to vote in South Dakota was interfered with by the counterfeit government that should have been thrown off by the People of South Dakota last November, and new guards established (J.A.I.L.) for their future security.This raises the question, which I asked Ron, how can a counterfeit government, that should be thrown off by the People as their duty to do, actually INTERFERE with the People's duty to throw it off? Clearly, we are living under tyranny, whether the People as a whole realize it or not. All it will take is enough People who are informed of this truth, and the truth about J.A.I.L., to throw off the counterfeit government by voting for J.A.I.L. which will provide the new guard for their future security as the Declaration instructs us. That's how close we are, and the enemy knows it. That's why they're so scared of J.A.I.L. and are doing anything and everything imaginable, through fraud, lies, and deceit, to defeat it. The People must rise above these shenanigans. It's up to them to do so if they wish to accept the offer of J.A.I.L.I asked Ron, "What if there aren't enough People knowledgeable to accomplish this duty?" and he said that the only alternative to tyranny (the status quo), without the J.A.I.L. solution, would by nature lead to anarchy." I have to agree with that conclusion. The choice is J.A.I.L. or Anarchy-- which will it be?Have the People gained any knowledge since the South Dakota election fiasco?Probably the most significant fact that has been exposed by the South Dakota fiasco is that the state is run by a foreign power, not government. We have a number of J.A.I.L. News Journals reporting on that evidence. One of them isJ.A.I.L. Has Exposed the Foreign Power Running South DakotaJ.A.I.L. will always have a purpose For The Peoplehttp://www.jail4judges.org/JNJ_Library/2007/2007-01-19A.html in which we report:South Dakota was the pioneer state for J.A.I.L. in which the People qualified the Amendment for their ballot in 2006. To get a measure passed by the People requires the basic right to vote without interference by any power, civil or military. (SD Const. Art.VII §1). Little did we know or suspect that the Power running South Dakota would interfere with the election process, resulting in a "Show-Election." "Show-Election" in South Dakota 2006, resulting in the annihilation of the People's right to reform their government (SD Const. Art.VI §26) and their right to a fair election (SD Const. Art.VII §1).Another one, in which we describe the foreign power, is What Did the "Show-Election" in South Dakota REALLY Show? It showed that we are being run by a Foreign Power! http://www.jail4judges.org/JNJ_Library/2007/2007-01-11.htmlI closed that JNJ with the following questions:In the JNJ "Show-Election" in South Dakota 2006 I posed the question:"What happens when the constitutional remedy to reform government by the People is blocked by the very government sought to be reformed?" Based on what we have learned above, the answer rests on the fact that we're dealing with a FOREIGN POWER. That foreign power is not bound by either the United States nor the South Dakota Constitution. There is no "constitutional remedy to reform government" under that power. So the question might be rephrased:"What happens when a foreign power that has taken over control in this country prevents the People from exercising their inherent rights?"The answer to my previous question, "What happens when a foreign power that has taken over control in this country prevents the People from exercising their inherent rights?" is that the People must decide what method of change is required "to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security." One thing we know: Change is necessary; change will happen. The Laws of Nature will demand it. Being under the control of a Foreign Power is not in accordance with the state of nature, and it cannot remain that way by Nature.To decide what method of change is required, the People must first determine if change is necessary, and if so, determine "the nature of the power in control," as I stated in that same JNJ:
In order for the People to be able to exercise their rights to reform government and to vote, they must first know what kind of entity is controlling those processes that can block those rights. We're referring specifically to getting J.A.I.L. passed by lawful means. J.A.I.L. is still the only remedy for the People. The People will have to determine, based on evidence, the nature of the power in control in order to decide what method is necessary to carry out the mandate set forth in the Declaration of Independence: "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security." (Id.)We have received objection from a few of our readers to our usage of the term "foreign power" saying that most people won't understand it, that it's above most people's heads, etc. It's high time they DO understand it for the sake of this country! That's exactly WHY we are reporting on it, with plenty of evidence to substantiate it. Since the South Dakota election fiasco, we have changed the motto in our heading to: "The Battle Lines are Drawn: J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power. A Power Foreign to Our Constitution."Whatever it is called, we are referring to the power that must be thrown off by the People, described in the Declaration as one that manifests "a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce [the People] under absolute despotism." It could be referred to as a "counterfeit government," but use of the word "government" at all misses the point that we have no government whatsoever which we have substantiated by the writings of John Locke in his Second Treatise on Government. Government ceases when it ceases to protect the People's rights. People's rights being routinely violated by the power in control is, by definition, not of government, but of a foreign power-- a power foreign to our Constitution that has reduced the People under absolute despotism.The dissolution of government, according to Locke, results in anarchy. See"Will J.A.I.L. Lead to Anarchy?" 2/10/06http://www.jail4judges.org/JNJ_Library/2006/2006-02-10A.html in which we report:Anarchy happens when "there is no longer the administration of justice for the securing of men's rights, nor any remaining power within the community to direct the force, [i.e., no provision by which the People can enforce the Constitution] or provide for the necessities of the public" resulting in the absence of government and the people becoming "a confused multitude, without order or connexion." Anarchy results from the effectual dissolution of government by its failure and refusal to protect the People's rights. The Second Treatise of Civil Government (1690) by John Locke, at Chapter XIX "Of the Dissolution of Government" Sec. 218. http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtr19.htmWhen the government has ceased protecting the rights of the People and thereby has ceased to exist as government, the People are at liberty to provide for themselves by reforming and restoring government to what it was meant to be when originally instituted for their safety and happiness. (supra) Sec. 220.John Locke, known as the "Philosopher of Freedom" had the greatest influence on our Declaration of Independence. "Government, according to John Locke, will lose its right to exercise its power, however, when government abuses its people worse than any imaginable group of marauders that might be operating in the absence of a government. ... Further, in Lockean theory, if government abuses the exercise of the power given it by the people, why then, the people have a natural right to rebel, as did the people of New England in 1776." The Theory of Government, By Peter Landry. http://www.blupete.com/Literature/Essays/BluePete/Government.htmConclusionI stated above that all that was necessary for the possibility of passing J.A.I.L. was that the People become knowledgeable of the fact that we have a foreign power (a counterfeit government) in control in this country and must rise above the fraud, lies, and deceit used by the foreign power to defeat J.A.I.L. The People must understand that the only thing sustaining the foreign power is the ignorance of the People, nothing else. No matter how much money and other resources is pumped into the enemy propaganda machine, the People can overcome it by acting on the knowledge of truth.However, some of our readers have expressed doubt that we'll be able to pass J.A.I.L. by the vote, since the People are not in control of the voting process. Joseph Stalin said "He who votes decides nothing; he who counts the votes decides everything" which brings the question,Who is counting the votes? We were told that in South Dakota on election night, the percentage results (89% against, and 11% in favor of J.A.I.L.) did not change or vary all evening, from about 7:30 p.m. to about 11 p.m. Up until election day, J.A.I.L. was on top. Suddenly the bottom dropped out in one day. So it's the counting or tabulating of the votes that is the crucial factor in the voting process. Clearly, there is a conflict of interest in having the counterfeit government, that is to be thrown off by the People through their vote, count that vote!In California, there is a maxim of jurisprudence that states "The law never requires impossibilities." (Civil Code §3531). If that's true, the law must providethat a neutral entity be delegated the responsibility of counting the votes. If we can't rely on the vote to throw off a despotic government, the result will be throwing it off by anarchy which, by nature, will eventually lead to the establishment of a new government. Nevertheless, at some point, an honest voting process will have to be established for the People to keep a new government in check, i.e., "to provide new guards for their future security."
J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law) www.jail4judges. org
To be automatically added to future mailings, place the word Subscribe in the subject line and email to VictoryUSA@jail4jud ges.org
We are a ministry in great need of your financial support. Please donate to this important work at "J.A.I.L." P.O. Box 207, North Hollywood, CA 91603
J.A.I.L. is a unique addition to our Constitution heretofore unrealized.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
E-Group sign on at http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/jail4judge s/join
Visit our active flash - http://www.jail4jud ges.org/national _001.htm
* * *
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation. - Declaration of Independence
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." -- Henry David Thoreau <><