INFORM THE PEOPLE OF WHY WE NEED J.A.I.L.
have been asked to post examples of judicial corruption as told by alleged
victims thereof. We say "alleged" because J.A.I.L. cannot vouch for the
authenticity and truth of these "horror stories" as we call them. They are
merely the testimony of the writer to inform the public of examples of what is
allegedly happening to the People in our courts today to show the dire need to
make J.A.I.L. a reality. J.A.I.L. takes no position one way or the other of the
personal views stated by the writer. Please understand that we cannot
possibly post ALL testimonies we receive. For any questions or
comments about the contents of the article, please direct them to the
writer of the article, shown below. Do not burden J.A.I.L.'s
already over-burdened email. Thank you.
Any questions or
comments, email directly to:
January 9, 2006
Chief justice of Supreme Court and Head of the
Please share with the other justices and officers of the
The Supreme Court and the judiciary are the peoples' last line
at the State level against judicial errors, wrongful prosecution
criminal acts by government actors and courts. As a condition of
job, justices of the Supreme Court and the judiciary promised by oath
PROTECT the peoples' constitutional rights.
The Supreme Court
justices failed (en-banc) to honor their oath to
protect my Constitutional
rights. I tendered pleadings, paid the fees
($150.00) then the Supreme Court
kept (stole) the money and refused to
hear my case. This fraud is common
practice by this court and it signals
to prosecutors that they can rely on
winning a high number of cases by
default of not being heard.
judiciary failed to honor its oath to protect my Constitutional
refusing to reasonably act on complaints and allegations
against its members
(BAR members /"good old boys"). Protecting these
"good old boys" is common
practice by the judiciary signaling that these
"good old boys" can rely on
being protected for their crimes.
The city of Longmont began prosecuting
me in mid-1997 for 12 zoning
violations they knew to be false. This case made
its way through 2
municipal court trials and 2 District Court appeals, an
appeal to the
Supreme Court, multiple sentencing orders, complaint to the
post-conviction motions, other complications, charges of violating
sentencing order, filing of 15 new false charges and finally,
of all charges in December of 2002.
Conviction was not
possible by application of the law. The Longmont
prosecutor, his witnesses
and 3 separate judges chose to knowingly
misrepresent the law and the facts
and commit perjury. There is evidence
of forged documents being filed in the
The Supreme Court defrauded me of $150.00, then abandoned
Subsequently, my attorney threw out my file, left for Florida
abandoned my case. I refused to obey the illegal sentencing order. I
charged with violating the illegal sentencing order. I was charged
15 new zoning violations the city of Longmont knew to be false. Thank
for a stupid prosecutor, this gave me a "second bite of the
I made clear to the municipal judge, prosecutor and their
this time they would have to apply the law because I would not
their lies, perjury and misrepresentations a second time. I then
another attorney who filed one motion and the municipal judge
all (false) charges. The next day I took many pictures of my
document its condition at time of dismissal.
I was made
to defend myself from known false charges by "dirt bag"
and judges at a cost of untold thousands of dollars,
loss of business equity,
loss of business income, loss of property rental
personal income (continuing), lower Social Security
devalued inheritance (continuing) and personal pain
initial attorney said, don't piss off the Supreme Court because you
to rely on them some day. Looking back, I think the opposite.
I would like to thank the Supreme Court (en-banc) and the
the lesson(s). Doing me brown taught me the importance of
the traitors that "operate" the "piss-ant" courts and not to
rely on the
traitors who "operate" the Supreme Court and/or the judiciary.
It also taught me not to be upset by being called a criminal and
it written in public records by "dirt bag" government officials
judges who in fact are the criminals as long as they don't get upset
me for calling them what they are.
Why don't you and the other
Supreme Court justices honor your oath(s)
22 Main Street unit A
Longmont CO 80501
--------- Forwarded message ----------From: rick@...To: medialist@...
, scooplist@...Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:45:07 -0600
OPINION RELEASE: ADMINISTRATIVE TERRORISM
E-mail: rick@...OPINION RELEASE: ADMINISTRATIVE TERRORISM
NOTE: Folks, see how a city can detsroy you in the POLICE STATE OF
AMERICA. Longmont is as stinky and criminal as the rest in Colorado. When
does it stop? When the people have had enough...
From Clyde Ioerger (pronounced
I watched your case almost from its beginning and
attended one of your
hearings in Brighton where the piss-ant judge made
pretend he was so
afraid of being arrested by the militia. He should be
criminal (jerks) like him who put honest law abiding people in
every day. Fear of being prosecuted, fined and imprisoned for
complying with the law and for demanding ones rights. Fear of losing
trumped-up charges. Fear of government discrimination and
assassination. Need I go on? This guy is a government
I am also the subject of "administrative terrorism" by
Mine is a case of "habitual
administrative terrorism" (that has roots
going back more than 22 years) by
governmental officials including
Longmont Colorado council members, a mayor,
judge and prosecutor,
departmental directors, legal staff, several city
employees, and district
and Supreme Court judges. Every person, including the
in these acts against me is a slime ball.
April 8, 1983 I lease/purchased almost an acre of
Industrial Railroad property adjoining US Highway 287 and
consisting of 3 separate lots and 3 structures located in the original town
Longmont director of wastewater, Dave Plumb,
(also the city manager)
assured me that the city's sanitary sewer was
accessible to the property
so, my wife and I sold our home and put the equity
into this property.
A local contractor agreed to partner with us and
build a large structure
containing 3 rental shops and share the rental
After the purchase, the city refused to provide sewer access to
property. They also refused to accept applications for building
and tap fees claiming they would just be denied anyway because
property was not connected to the sewer. The city notified my
they intended to continue to deny sewer access and building
The city did not make the sewer accessible to this property
until almost 20
years later during 2001.
Disclosing the city's refusal
to provide sewer and issue building permits
stopped the ability of selling
the property. Without building permits, the property could only be used for
uses that were a "use by right" in the zoning code because it could not be
re-developed for other uses. Our partner couldn't put up a structure so he
split. My wife and I were left to choke on this property.
municipal code allowed commercial vehicle storage as a use "by
right" in this
property's zoning district meaning building permit(s) and
approvals were not required to begin the use, so among other
uses, we started
a commercial vehicle storage.
By 1984 the city threatened to put me out
of business by finding enough
wrong with my septic system to red tag my
structure(s) for no occupancy.
On the heels of this threat, I turned the city
in to the county health
department for operating a city structure on a septic
tank without a leech bed and instead, it was draining into the storm sewer
system. The city fixed this little problem within 4 days by disconnecting
it from the storm sewer.
Within a year or so, the city invited me to
a meeting where they insinuated that I had been dumping oil into the storm
sewer. The city's letter inviting me to this meeting revealed that the city
had trespassed onto my property and inspected it without my knowledge,
permission or a warrant.
The city continued denying sewer access to
our property until late 2001.
During this time the city discriminated by
issuing building permits to other properties (including a city property)
that were not connected to the sewer allowing them to be developed. The
city also discriminated by allowing an auto dealer (auto dealers are
required to have a rest room facility) to operate from a building with a
recorded occupancy permit restricting it to "storage use only" because the
city allowed it to be constructed without water and sewer
In 1985 a city water main broke causing underground flooding
property and a vehicle to sink and one of our 3 structures to
collapse and had to be torn down. The city repaired their water leak but
refused to address the damages to my structure.
During the 1980s and
until 1994, the city refused to stop habitually directing street traffic
across part of our property making that part of it unusable.
a 1994 street improvement project, the city upgraded the streets
sides of our property (corner lot). Against my objection, they
purposely and knowingly re-constructed the intersection to
traffic across our property.
During this 1994 street improvement project,
the city knowingly further
damaged our property by raising the abutting
streets (corner lot) and
trapping run-off on about 70 feet by well over 100
feet of our property,
completely encircling a structure.
this 1994 project the city removed reasonable access to our
first lot, then
forced us to repair their damage by removing uses from the
2nd and 3rd lots
to provide access across them to the affected lot. This
condemnation" and "forced merger." I filed claims for the
above damages which
the city smugly denied in 1996 with a see-us-in-court attitude signed by the
In late 1996, I filed a complaint against the city with the
Governor's office. The Governor's office demanded answers from the Longmont
A little over 6 months later, the city sent code inspector Diana
planner Bob Steimle to harass me with demand that I alter the
remove my lawfully grand-fathered commercial vehicle storage,
threat of court action.
Next, the city sent animal control
officers 2 separate times to search the property, both times without
warrant and with false allegations of neglect and cruelty.
attorney Randell Renquist (criminal) began making (several) harassing phone
calls threatening court action if I would not alter the property or remove
my lawfully grandfathered use.
City sales tax employee Dexter Wyoshida
(criminal) harassed me by phone
with false allegations of tax fraud and with
threat of audit. He asked me to provide evidence that all taxes were paid on all
vehicles stored on my
property. He demanded that I turn in my sales tax
license and apply for 2
new ones, one for my commercial vehicle storage and
another for my
vehicle and parts sales. This would have created a document
the city could use (in court) to argue that my 1983 commercial vehicle
storage began on the date of that new tax license
Wyoshida contacted the Colorado sales tax licensing audit
and the Colorado auto dealer licensing investigation staff,
seeking audit (by them) of my state sales tax license and my auto dealer
license. Without realizing it, the auto dealer licensing investigators
became involved in the city's harassment and audited my license, but I
caught the tax license audit selection staff in time to stop them from
being suckered by the city.
About 3 years later, a city
employee approached me and said, "do you
remember me, I was there when
Brad was being mean to you." This
employee claims having been present
and overhearing city planning director Brad Schol direct Wyoshida to
conduct the above acts against me.
The city began conducting code
compliance inspections of neighboring
properties telling them I was the cause
for the inspection. I complained
that this was slander, character
assassination and defamation and was meant to turn my neighbors against me.
Phil DelVecchio, Director of Community Development, answered my complaint
by letter saying that the city would quit using my name while doing
City code inspector Diana Dunn told her supervisor that my property
was lawfully grandfathered and that she would not perjure herself
in court testimony against me. She was found "ineffective," removed from
the case and replaced by code inspector Shannon Stadler
The city changed a section of the municipal code without
change(s) by ordinance (as required by city charter and State
posted the illegally altered code on their web page and in the code
at the city clerk's office. At the same time, they posted it
(unchanged, as originally adopted) in the public library. Also, it
was posted correctly in the adopting ordinance in the city clerk's
This was intentional fraud because the city purposely, knowingly
intent, posted this (false certificate) in the code book and on
the city's web page (internet fraud) knowing that's where lawyers,
court clerks and judges search the codes.
In late 1998, the city
issued a summons and complaint they knew to be false charging me with 12
separate violations of the above illegally altered municipal code and
re-defining 12 commercially stored vehicles on my property as "junked
Using the word "junked vehicle" to describe "commercially
in each false charge was statutory defamation, character
assassination and was meant to influence everyone, including judges and the
press into belief the city was dealing with a 2nd class citizen, a keeper
of "junk." That coupled with posting false code provisions as
described above were meant to gain conviction in this case. It worked. Just
who is the criminal here?
While preparing for trial, city attorneys
Clay Douglas and Randel Renquist and city manager Gordon Pedrow (criminals)
denied me access to my criminal justice records (discovery). They said
rules of court procedure allowed them to deny me access to that file
because an attorney was representing me. They explained that these rules
were in place to provide a professional courtesy between prosecution and
defense attorneys, so a defendant would not jeopardize his own attorney's
position (strategy). They said if I fired my attorney, I would be allowed
access to that file.
The city continued withholding public record
and/or discovery throughout
the entire prosecution.
This case was
being investigated by the Boulder County DA's office at
my request. The
investigator (not a criminal) died suddenly and her
supervisor, Deputy District Attorney Brian Quiram
closed the investigation and denied my access to
public record and/or
discovery in the investigator's file. Being a party, I
motioned the District Court for access to the file. Boulder County District
Court judge Roxanne Bailin (CRIMINAL) denied my motion and made
false accusations against me in her order.
Under color of law, while
off duty and on his own time, Chief building
official David VanAllen
(criminal) (also, code enforcement supervisor)
proceeded against me in his
personal capacity by trespassing onto
private property and searching my
property without permission or a warrant.
VanAllen was also the complainant
and advisory witness to city prosecutor
Rod Rangel (criminal) and sat with
and advised him during the court
Prior to this prosecution, the city
(VanAllen's department) destroyed all but a few pages of my property file,
which was about 1/2 inch thick during the 1980s.
Randell Renquist directed city departments not to sign or date stamp my
copy of any written request for anything including public records and
The case finally went to trial in late 1999.
code inspector Shannon Stadler admitted in court that she
private property without lawful permission or a warrant for
of searching my property. Stadler also lied under oath multiple times
against me during court hearings.
Chief building official David VanAllen
lied under oath multiple times against me during 2 separate court
Longmont planner Bob Steimle (criminal) lied under oath
against me during court hearings.
Rod Rangel (criminal) lied under oath multiple times
against me during each
hearing and lied (issued false certificate(s)) in
motions to municipal,
district and the supreme courts. He is a pathological liar.
judge Diana VanDeHey (CRIMINAL) made a pretend finding that my "vehicle
storage" would have been a violation of the 1983 code and
therefore is not
grandfathered. Even after requested, she refused to identify any 1983 code
section that she pretended the use would have violated. She continued that
lie to the district and supreme courts and included other lies to cover
for that one.
Judge VanDeHey sentenced me to pay a fine, court costs,
service, probation for 1 year (against my will), to remove our
vehicle storage from the property within 45 days and to allow
periodic code inspections for up to 1 year.
I appealed the
conviction to the Boulder County District Court. Judge Dan
(criminal) affirmed the trial court's conviction by making up a pretend
finding (lie) that the 1983 and the 1998 codes were essentially the same
therefore, because the 1998 code did not expressly allow the use, it would
have been a violation of the 1983 code. Just like VanDeHey, Hale refused to
identify any section of the 1983 code section his "LIE BY PRETEND" claims
the use would have violated.
Judge Hale remanded the case back to the
municipal court for a hearing on
the issue of estoppel. During this hearing,
Stadler, Steimle, VanAllen and prosecutor Rangel (criminals) again lied
under oath against me. Judge
VanDeHey made a pretend finding (lie) which was
unsupported by the record, that I hid my property use (commercial vehicle
storage) from the
city and "they just didn't see it." That was bull
.... My lawful storage
facility was unscreened and completely visible
to U S Highway 287 (main
street) and to 1st avenue. It even shows on the
city's own periodical aerial photographs. Just like Rangel, VanDeHey is a
I appealed VanDeHey's order to the Boulder County
District Court. Judge
Hale rotated off this case and Judge Roxanne (CRIMINAL)
Bailin previously obstructed my ability to reasonably defend
myself in the first trial in this case by denying my access to
public record/discovery and lying outright in that order. Even with
this conflict, Bailin refused to step aside, recuse herself, or grant
change of venue enabling her to lie again to affirm VanDeHey's order. She
is a lying ... and the 3rd judge who refused to identify any
statute my property use allegedly violated in 1983.
As a matter of
fact, all 3 of these judges are lying ... because the 1983 code expressly
allowed my property use and all subsequent codes grand-fathered the
This was followed by a second sentencing hearing after which, due
heart illness, my attorney made a timely motion to the Colorado
Supreme Court for a 4-day extension of time to file a writ of certiorari.
The Supreme Court did not answer the motion in time so he hand-carried the
writ to the
Supreme Court by the 4th day at which time, the Court demanded
required fee ($150.00) to docket (accept) it. Around 10 days after
4th day, the Supreme Court (en-banc) denied motion for extension of
The Supreme Court judges (en-banc) ripped me off. They kept
$150.00 (fraud) and denied my constitutional right to access the
These judges are traitors to their oath to defend my
constitutional rights. Just who the hell are the criminals in this
At this point this case is 4 and ½ years old and has cost a
fortune. I sold personal vehicles, construction equipment and cashed in an
insurance policy just to get by, and rode my bicycle to and from work and
to do errands.
As if things weren't bad enough, suddenly my attorney
dumped all of his
client files, including mine, in the Erie Colorado landfill
and skipped off to a new life in Plantation Florida. I had to move on
I viewed the Supreme Court file and found that when the judges
decided my motion, they didn't even have my entire file before
them because part of it was still in their clerk's office. I also found
that someone claiming to be my attorney sent documents to the Supreme
Court. The documents were sent to the Supreme Court during a time while I
had my attorney's copies of those very documents in my possession. They
couldn't have been sent by my attorney because, I had them. The
prosecutor, municipal court and district court had the only other
I motioned the Supreme Court to re-consider. They denied my
The city notified me that because the Supreme Court
refused to hear my
appeal that I had exhausted all my remedies. They
reinstated the sentence, fine and one year probation. I was ordered to
remove stored vehicles from the property within 45 days and allow
compliance inspections during that year.
I filed a motion (pro-se)
for post-conviction review with the Boulder County District Court. It went
before judge Bailin. I filed a motion to recuse because early in this case,
she denied me access to public records and discovery. She denied both
motions, after which the city again reinstated the sentencing
The city sent a notice of intent to inspect the property for
compliance with the sentencing order. I responded that the judge ordered me
sentencing order) to conduct criminal acts against my wife under
threat of imprisonment and fines.
I notified them that: my wife and
I own the business and the property jointly and she is an indispensable
party who will be affected by this prosecution. Also, that she was never
charged, tried, or convicted; therefore, her property use remains lawful,
and she cannot be tried for this same crime without making me a party,
which would bring double-jeopardy. And, that she asserts her constitutional
rights and protections against any taking and/or unwarranted search or
After a long period, the city notified me that I was in
violation of probation. Next the city issued a single summons and complaint
naming my wife and I as defendants and charging us with 15 violations of
the same altered code I was initially charged with. I claimed
double-jeopardy because one or more of the charges was included in the
first prosecution. The city continued anyway.
I began calling
lawyers. It took calling almost 70 lawyers to find one. Several from
Boulder, Denver (30 miles) and even farther said they would have a conflict
because the city hired them for some little job in the past. One attorney
said that cities generally hire effective area attorneys and law firms at
least once for the purpose of creating such conflict to create such odds in
Former Longmont assistant city attorney Diane Goldenstine
called my case
a "tar baby" because, in her words, "you were not nice to
her husband was a council member, I supported a committee to
and other council members.
My wife and I had an interview
with former Longmont City attorney Ralph
Josephsohn. He said sure, your
property use was lawful in 1983 and is
grandfathered but the city is
determined to get that use off your property. He said you're going before
judge VanDeHey so, you are going to lose. Worse yet, Rangel is the
prosecutor so, you are really going to lose. You don't stand a chance with
an appeal to the district court because they will give VanDeHey what she
He declined to represent us adding that we would be lucky to find
a lawyer that would. He said that our only option would be to remove
our lawful use from the property or strike a deal with the city. He
then walked out of his own office leaving us there to pick up our papers
Finally, an attorney agreed to represent us. He filed one
motion to dismiss. After nearly 5 years, the city dismissed all charges in
late December of 2002.
This false prosecution was so lengthy and
costly that we had sold most of
our vehicles and equipment, and liquidated
insurance and other savings
(almost everything) just to keep
Back to the sewer issue.
Just prior to this dismissal, the
sewer (after 18 years) finally became
accessible to the property, so we
leased part of the property to a national company. They needed building
permits to remodel to suit their use, which required a sewer
Knowing we were on our knees from the lengthy prosecution,
escalated the administrative terrorism against us. Seems this was
to finish us off.
The city waited until our permit application,
engineering, surveying and
approvals were in place and the contractor was
hired to extend sewer to our property. Then fire official Mike Zielinski wrote a
2½ page memo to our new tenant falsely indicating that our property was
extremely contaminated beyond compliance with federal, state and local law.
He said his supervisor Mike Selan directed him to write the
Next, city sewer employee Barbara McGrane stopped the
construction project demanding that I must first test my
neighbor's property (and ours) and provide evidence that neither property
is contaminated. She
refused to accept a late 2000 memo from the Oil
Inspection of the State of Colorado notifying us that contamination from a
prior bulk fuel storage use on our property were at low enough levels that
the state did not require remediation.
Next, the city called a
meeting with private attorney Rick Samson, McGrane, city attorney Jay
Orourke, and my surveyor and project engineer. At the last moment, McGrane
said that I could not attend this meeting. Immediately afterward, my
project engineer told us the meeting had nothing to do with sewer. Instead,
the city claimed that we did not own part of our property and that the city
owned it. He charged me for representing our property interest (legal
representation) at this meeting, but refused my written request for notes
or minutes of the meeting. McGrane and Orourke also refused my written
request for notes or minutes of the meeting.
Our new tenant stopped
their re-model project and hired an environmental
attorney and sat still
until the sewer connection was almost finished, then issued notice of lease
cancellation. The issues caused by the city turned this $17,000.00 sewer
extension/connection into a more than $42,000.00 issue, got our lease
cancelled and put us many months off schedule.
We got our tenant to
stay and are continuing on.
There are numerous other issues brought by
the city which, are not yet
I nominate the city of Longmont
for "stinky municipality" award.
I nominate all city officials involved
in this case for "stinky city worker" award.
I nominate Judges
VanDeHey, Hale, Bailin and the Colorado Supreme Court
judges (traitors who
pooped on my constitutional rights) for "stinky judge" award.
nominate prosecutor Rangel, city attorney's Douglas Renquist, other city
attorneys, assistant DA Brian Quiram and prior city attorneys Goldenstine
and Josephsohn for a "stinky attorney" award.