They didn't allow Irwin to say anything.
Everything was objected to by the prosecutors and sustained by the judge.
"Entered", evidence was not allowed to
be viewed by the jury when they asked to see it. They wanted to see Cindy's
well worn code manual and a new one for comparison. "Denied"
Ex parte communications took place and
the judge even admitted it. And said it was not proprietary.
Irwin could not bring all
of his witnesses in to testify and the ones that were allowed were
limited to character witnesses only. Some of the
witnesses were marandized after they were sworn in. I couldn't believe
Irwin's hearing problem made it
difficult to know what was being said behind him, which got him sanctions
equaling 2 or more years in jail. The government would make objections while
sitting behind him and Irwin couldn't here them so he kept on presenting his
case. The judge would sustain the objections and Irwin didn't even know it was
made. He could have walked in with his hands tied behind his back and duct
tape over his mouth to get his message across.
They wouldn't provide transcripts and
only allowed him to view the dailies a few days before the trial was over.
I can go on and on, it would make your
head swim! Irwin went in there believing that truth and justice would prevail.
He learned the hard way that it doesn't matter any more. The constitution is
barely hanging by a thread. I saw it with my own eyes. When it comes to
messing with their "take" they will mow you down regardless of who's
Irwin Schiff News
Time Is Running
Out -- For All Of Us
I think this gives a pretty good run down of the
things done to prevent Irwin Schiff (or anyone for that matter) from having a
fair trial. Trials are a sham, designed to fool the unenlightened masses. They
think they are being protected by the state that is screwing them. That
naiveté begins with the public school system that was created not to teach
reading, writing, and arithmetic, but to turn out docile compliant citizens.
In that regard, it has been a colossal success.
Remember that when a
jury is impaneled, those people are specifically chosen for their mushy,
malleable minds. Show any signs of being able to think, and you will be
rejected. In this case a FIJA worker was arrested to prevent him from turning
some of that mush into brains.
If a person were to have a dispute with
me, and I said that it could be settled by one of my tight bros, all who had
more brains than an oyster would immediately see that they wouldn't have a
chance. But the same thing happens with the state every time, and the
overwhelming majority don't give it a second thought. The judge and the
prosecutors both get their checks from the same source the United States
treasury. And by the way, the jury is the real judge, the judge's role is
really more of a referee, or at least should be. But here, and in most case,
he is actively working for the interests of those who pay him the
This woman says we should shoot the bastards... She makes a lot
of good points. If we can't get a fair hearing, is there any other way?
Educating our fellow citizens doesn't seem to be making much
As combative as I am, I would rather seek a peaceful solution.
Fighting is just a lot of work, and I'm not all that much into hard work. But
everyday, I become less optimistic. I'm well past prime now, but if there is
going to be a fight, I hope it comes before I get too old to acquit myself
well in battle. The mind and spirit are willing, but the flesh is weakening.
At 63, I think I'm a more dangerous adversary than I was at 23, but how much
longer will I be able to say that?
Folks, time is running out for all