>My questions are:
>>(1) Who wins the credibility battle between Jack and the nurse
>>over what was actually said in the examination room?
>>Jack if proper investigation is followed!
>>(2) What difference, if any, does it make that the nurse practitioner
>>licensed only as a registered nurse with no license to practice as a nurse
>>practitioner although she had completed the formal schooling to become
Big difference, Nurse should have realized the seriousness of the
> >condition from the call the day before from patient. She should have then
> >and called in the physician to follow up.
> >> (3) what else do you think about the case? Who wins? what is important
> >>and what is not?
> > Important that Nurses past history is investigated.
> She should have consulted with Physician.
> If investigated properly and evidence is brought forward of
> this. JACK WINS!
I also think that it goes to the nurse's credibility.. makes Jack more honest
I wonder if a nurse practioner would have made a difference?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]