Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
Browse Groups

• ## i think i better post this in case anything happens to me..

(2)
• NextPrevious
• oh by the way if I disappear call it Gazoo theory.. work in progress.. just preliminary haven’t really figured it out yet.. I have said before that E=mu^3
Message 1 of 2 , Aug 13
View Source
oh by the way if I disappear call it Gazoo theory..
work in progress..  just preliminary haven’t really figured it out yet..

I have said before that E=mu^3  with u being the  curvature.  u=1/r in two dimensions. see footnote.

in three dimensions I believe curvature is 1/r^2     in four dimension curvature is 1/r^3  thus E=mu^3 also being equal to E=mc^2

NOW HERE IS MY POINT.       now draw the hypotenuse to the triangle formed and that is c.  I have to make a bit of an assumption here.  that this  applies in general terms, to all dimensions. just being sort of a rule. when u what is ..?? tesseract or is it transform..  from one dimension to the next..   so u have the general Pythagorean theorem a^2 + b^2=c^2   remember that when I started I said 4 dimensions. so r would be r^3.  BUT YET c is still c^2.  but maybe this a flaw .. maybe it isn’t.  afterall I’m making this stuff up. creative license.  so will assume r here, means r^3  and c stays the traditional c for the hypotenuse and c^2 in Pythagorean equation.  so we’ll speak in more general terms.  just A RULE OF NATURE WHEN GOING BETWEEN DIMENSIONS.  THE a^2 in the Pythagorean theorem is the radius of curvature of the dimension being described.  and who knows what c is.. hypoteneuse.. dimensional differential..?? plancks constant h..    hypoteneuse..   looking at it with the Pythagorean theorem, is a key that leads us into further understanding..   the
u know what, I’ve been working on this all morning.. I keep running into more material. I’m tired I’ll get back with u..

footnote:

A circle is a one-dimensional object, although one can embed it into a two-dimensional object. More precisely, it is a one-dimensional manifold. Manifolds admit an abstract description which is independent of a choice of embedding: for example, if you believe string theorists, there is a  10- or  11- or  26-dimensional manifold that describes space-time and a few extra dimensions, and we can study this manifold without embedding it into some larger  Rn.

Incidentally, you might guess that  n-dimensional things ought to be embeddable into  Rn+1 ( n+1-dimensional space). Actually, this is false: there are intrinsically  n-dimensional things, such as the Klein bottle (which is  2-dimensional) which can't be embedded into  Rn+1. The Klein bottle does admit an embedding into  R

• this is like a riff to a song I’m still working out.. From: George T. Pantos Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 7:26 PM To: hameltech@yahoogroups.com Subject:
Message 2 of 2 , Aug 13
View Source
this is like a riff to a song 'I’m still working out..

Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 7:26 PM
Subject: [hameltech] i think i better post this in case anything happens to me..

oh by the way if I disappear call it Gazoo theory..
work in progress..  just preliminary haven’t really figured it out yet..

I have said before that E=mu^3  with u being the  curvature.  u=1/r in two dimensions. see footnote.

in three dimensions I believe curvature is 1/r^2     in four dimension curvature is 1/r^3  thus E=mu^3 also being equal to E=mc^2

NOW HERE IS MY POINT.       now draw the hypotenuse to the triangle formed and that is c.  I have to make a bit of an assumption here.  that this  applies in general terms, to all dimensions. just being sort of a rule. when u what is ..?? tesseract or is it transform..  from one dimension to the next..   so u have the general Pythagorean theorem a^2 + b^2=c^2   remember that when I started I said 4 dimensions. so r would be r^3.  BUT YET c is still c^2.  but maybe this a flaw .. maybe it isn’t.  afterall I’m making this stuff up. creative license.  so will assume r here, means r^3  and c stays the traditional c for the hypotenuse and c^2 in Pythagorean equation.  so we’ll speak in more general terms.  just A RULE OF NATURE WHEN GOING BETWEEN DIMENSIONS.  THE a^2 in the Pythagorean theorem is the radius of curvature of the dimension being described.  and who knows what c is.. hypoteneuse.. dimensional differential..?? plancks constant h..    hypoteneuse..   looking at it with the Pythagorean theorem, is a key that leads us into further understanding..   the
u know what, I’ve been working on this all morning.. I keep running into more material. I’m tired I’ll get back with u..

footnote:

A circle is a one-dimensional object, although one can embed it into a two-dimensional object. More precisely, it is a one-dimensional manifold. Manifolds admit an abstract description which is independent of a choice of embedding: for example, if you believe string theorists, there is a  10- or  11- or  26-dimensional manifold that describes space-time and a few extra dimensions, and we can study this manifold without embedding it into some larger  Rn.

Incidentally, you might guess that  n-dimensional things ought to be embeddable into  Rn+1 ( n+1-dimensional space). Actually, this is false: there are intrinsically  n-dimensional things, such as the Klein bottle (which is  2-dimensional) which can't be embedded into  Rn+1. The Klein bottle does admit an embedding into  R4. More generally, the Whitney embedding theorem tells you that smooth  n-dimensional manifolds can be embedded into  R2n for  n>0, and for topological manifolds see this MO question.

There are also other notions of dimension more general than that for manifolds: see the Wikipedia article.

also see..

Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.