>Ya gotta know why Peter and Matthew are wrong to get the whole
>picture. Peter says J's like an angel; Matthew says he's like a man. Third
>possibility? Probably a "living spirit" - a combination of both that
>"twins" of J can emulate.
I should have added that the spiritual side (angel) has to be the master of
the human side (man), cuz "you can't serve two masters". So both meanings
of 'Thomas' come into play here - 'twin' (of J) and 'two things' (spirit
and body+soul - heaven and earth - life and death).