At 07:03 PM 1/01/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>I thought you might appreciate this situation:
>I thought I had discovered the most efficient way to
>post photos online with the minimum amount of html
>coding. However, halfway through the process I
>discovered a much more efficient (and easier) method.
>I haven't yet gotten around to posting via the second
>method but if you'd like to see the first effort,
>All the best,
>PS: Anyone viewing this on a dialup connection, I'd
>appreciate feedback about the length of time taken for
>photos to load, etc. (I'm currently on a cable modem).
Arlyn - I'm on 53.2 kbps at the moment and the page took about a minute -
quite acceptable I'd say for a page with so many images.
- Michael C.