The kind that recognizes the fact that no matter how many times you explain epigenetic factors involved in transcription
control, you still can't address observed genomic
changes. When asked to describe a mechanism that would make such changes (which is not described in any of your publications), you simply refuse and state that nobody would understand it anyway.
--- In email@example.com, james kohl <jvkohl@...> wrote:
> What kind of idiot states:
> "I have never seen a single one of the citations referenced actually
> support Kohl's crazy crackpot idea that what organisms eat produce
> pheromone variations that are the cause of their evolution into
> different species..."
> when all evidence from every scientific discipline supports my model? That was a rhetorical question. See for example:Physiology is rocking the foundations of evolutionary biology
> James V. Kohl
> Medical laboratory scientist (ASCP)
> Independent researcher
> Kohl, J.V. (2013) Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 3: 20553.
> Kohl, J.V. (2012) Human pheromones and food odors: epigenetic influences on the socioaffective nature of evolved behaviors. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 2: 17338.