Eivor wrote, responding to Edouard Kloczko:
> Anyway, of all those that do exist online, Ardalambions are definetely
the best option. But if you were to make a reliable dictionary/wordlist,
what would you do different than Helge? Can you give an example what you
think is unacceptable about his? Just curious.
It is a strange fact that a few years ago, Edouard complimented one of the
wordlists he is now criticizing. At the time he didn't know it was I who
had compiled it, though...
I do not think my wordlists are in all respects beyond criticism; in
particular, I mix Quenya and Qenya forms somewhat more indiscriminately
than I would have done if I had compiled them now. Yet references are
provided throughout, so discerning users of these lists can tell what layer
of material any word comes from.