Nothing should have changed in a way that would break working conrefs.
Can you show an example of what you're doing?
If I had to predict, I would guess that you were using non-standard
addresses that worked in older versions of your tools but those tools were
fixed to conform to the standard.
On 4/27/12 8:58 AM, "rogue.writer" <rogue.writer@...> wrote:
> I have a master <dl> file and use conref to pull the <dd> in topic files.
> However, all conrefs to this master <dl> are "broken" now. Did something
> change in DITA 1.2 with <dl> and <dd>?
Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions
"Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together"
Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press,