Those of you who are not on the John_Lit e-mail group might want to know
that today (1/9/2004) there have been a number of fine posts discussing the
possible priority of GJohn, starting with comments on Robinson's noted
work, by Mark Matson, James McGrath, and Paul Anderson. I find their
approaches refreshing and so much more promising than the dismissive
back-of-the-hand treatment usually given to historical material in GJohn by
the Jesus Seminar and many many others.
Oh yes-- to SUBSCRIBE: e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org
Robert M. Schacht, Ph.D.
Northern Arizona University
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]