I noted you were deliberately rude. If this is really normal for you, I'm
I have long since stopped attempting to communicate with you on anything
vaguely representing a scholarly level because you have shown a marked
propensity to separate what one says into such meanlessly tiny pieces that
it is exceptionally hard to reconstruct the original thought and idea
without going back to the original post just to see where the fragment your
cited fitted in.
I could have guessed for want of ideas you would play tit-for-tat:
>I demand an immediate apology from Jim for making these absurd and
>damaging accusations against Prof. Smith.
This would have been amusingly misguided, after having read Jim's comments,
except that it was followed, thus:
>Myself, I owe apology to no one.
I don't mind you casting aspersions on me. I'm quite open and more worthy of
a loose word than most on the list. But please keep your
They don't seem to come from the heart.
(After restating that I feel you were both misguided and rude, and should
have apologised for the fruits of this misguidedness, I hereby drop the